👇 Find the featured cards in each pack
Explore the cards that can land in the hit slot, grouped by rarity with pull-rate context and live prices. Use the full set view to see every other card.
A Team Up pack puts a hit in slot 1 and slot 10, and about 1 in 8 packs holds one of the 2 rarities below. 49 of the set's 196 cards can fill them. The best of them is Gengar & Mimikyu GX #53 at $3,916.85 — a card you would open once in 306 packs. 28 trade above $50; the rest are worth about $61.48 each. Nobody has published a pull-rate study of Team Up, so these rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal.
Rates marked EST. are estimated: no pull-rate study of Team Up has been published, so the figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Good to about a tier, not to a decimal. Measured rates come from TCGplayer’s Authentication Center pack openings.
Published by Pokémon for the Sun & Moon era. Slot 1 is a hit slot too — most guides miss this. States which rarities each slot may hold, not how often. The figures are for the digital Pokémon TCG Live pack and are believed, not confirmed, to mirror the physical one.
Numbered above the set’s main run — the rainbow foils, the golds and the alternate arts. Pokémon files all of them under one label, so the market can price two cards in this tier hundreds of times apart.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 15 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
ExhaustionA large prior run has stalled: sales velocity decelerated sharply and returns turned negative. The move ending, distinct from a move reversing.Gengar & Mimikyu GXTeam Up · 186$551.23-0.2%72Quant score72 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Eevee & Snorlax GXTeam Up · 191$345.050.0%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Latias & Latios GXTeam Up · 190$208.080.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Magikarp & Wailord GXTeam Up · 183$145.430.0%46Quant score46 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Ampharos GXTeam Up · 185$62.680.0%65Quant score65 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Incineroar GXTeam Up · 188$25.170.0%63Quant score63 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Judge WhistleTeam Up · 194$7.150.0%66Quant score66 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Metal GogglesTeam Up · 195$4.430.0%24Quant score24 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Pikachu & Zekrom GXTeam Up · 184$248.010.0%60Quant score60 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Celebi & Venusaur GXTeam Up · 182$145.650.0%66Quant score66 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Hoopa GXTeam Up · 187$45.680.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Cobalion GXTeam Up · 189$18.390.0%56Quant score56 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Pokémon CommunicationTeam Up · 196$11.660.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Dangerous DrillTeam Up · 192$5.400.0%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
ElectrochargerTeam Up · 193$4.770.0%19Quant score19 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 34 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Gengar & Mimikyu GXTeam Up · 53$385.890.0%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Pikachu & Zekrom GXTeam Up · 33$53.550.0%60Quant score60 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Magikarp & Wailord GXTeam Up · 161$896.860.0%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Eevee & Snorlax GXTeam Up · 120$92.780.0%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Gengar & Mimikyu GXTeam Up · 164$409.54+1.4%70Quant score70 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Latias & Latios GXTeam Up · 113$80.380.0%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Eevee & Snorlax GXTeam Up · 171$244.830.0%24Quant score24 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Celebi & Venusaur GXTeam Up · 1$61.96+1.0%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Pikachu & Zekrom GXTeam Up · 162$176.290.0%65Quant score65 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Magikarp & Wailord GXTeam Up · 160$136.810.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Latias & Latios GXTeam Up · 169$121.720.0%65Quant score65 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Ingo & EmmetTeam Up · 176$43.520.0%37Quant score37 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
EvelynTeam Up · 175$60.990.0%49Quant score49 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MorganTeam Up · 178$52.430.0%26Quant score26 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Ampharos GXTeam Up · 163$28.990.0%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Ampharos GXTeam Up · 43$9.920.0%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
DanaTeam Up · 173$52.17-0.1%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Incineroar GXTeam Up · 97$3.49+2.0%76Quant score76 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
NitaTeam Up · 180$43.120.0%53Quant score53 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Hoopa GXTeam Up · 96$3.81-0.3%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Mr. Mime GXTeam Up · 67$4.680.0%26Quant score26 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Hoopa GXTeam Up · 166$18.62-1.4%20Quant score20 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Lycanroc GXTeam Up · 82$2.97+1.0%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
NanuTeam Up · 179$14.300.0%62Quant score62 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Incineroar GXTeam Up · 167$9.270.0%49Quant score49 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Cobalion GXTeam Up · 106$3.620.0%67Quant score67 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Latias & Latios GXTeam Up · 170$3,916.850.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Gengar & Mimikyu GXTeam Up · 165$2,119.050.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Sabrina’s SuggestionTeam Up · 181$210.080.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Erika’s HospitalityTeam Up · 174$146.710.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
JasmineTeam Up · 177$84.530.0%69Quant score69 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Brock’s GritTeam Up · 172$78.760.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.
Celebi & Venusaur GXTeam Up · 159$63.61+0.1%62Quant score62 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Cobalion GXTeam Up · 168$7.68+0.5%62Quant score62 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.About 12.3% of Team Up booster packs — about 1 in 8 — contain a card from one of the 2 hit rarities in the set. Secret Rares: about 1 in 72 packs. Ultra Rares: about 1 in 9 packs. These rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era; no pull-rate study of this set has been published.
49 of the 196 cards in Team Up are at a rarity a booster pack's hit slot can produce — Ultra Rare and above. The rest come out of the common, uncommon, reverse-holo and standard rare slots.
The rarest tier is Secret Rares in Team Up, at about 1 in 72 packs for any one of its 15 cards. A NAMED card from that tier is about 1 in 1,080 packs, assuming the tier's cards appear equally often.