Sword & Shield Pull Rates & Hits

Numbered above the set’s main run — the rainbow foils, the golds and the alternate arts. Pokémon files all of them under one label, so the market can price two cards in this tier hundreds of times apart.

Hit rate

1 in 48

Any one

about 1 in 671

Top

$106.54

Median

$11.21

Tier total

$256.79

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 14 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Snorlax VMAXSword & Shield · 206$106.54▲+0.7%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Morpeko VMAXSword & Shield · 204$26.70▲+0.3%56Quant score56 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Air BalloonSword & Shield · 213$11.60▼-1.3%65Quant score65 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.MarnieSword & Shield · 208$19.57·0.0%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Zacian VSword & Shield · 211$20.82·0.0%34Quant score34 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Lapras VMAXSword & Shield · 203$21.58·0.0%56Quant score56 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Zamazenta VSword & Shield · 212$13.22·0.0%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Quick BallSword & Shield · 216$10.81·0.0%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Professor's Research (Professor Magnolia)Sword & Shield · 209$3.98·0.0%79Quant score79 / 100▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Stonjourner VMAXSword & Shield · 205$6.05·0.0%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.BedeSword & Shield · 207$4.66·0.0%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Ordinary RodSword & Shield · 215$4.14▲+0.5%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Team Yell GruntSword & Shield · 210$4.63▲+1.5%69Quant score69 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Metal SaucerSword & Shield · 214$2.49▲+1.6%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.

Hit rate

1 in 26

Any one

about 1 in 415

Top

$34.64

Median

$4.96

Tier total

$142.76

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 16 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.MarnieSword & Shield · 200$34.64·0.0%58Quant score58 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Snorlax VSword & Shield · 197$33.45·0.0%32Quant score32 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Sableye VSword & Shield · 194$13.43▼-0.5%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Morpeko VSword & Shield · 190$12.76·0.0%34Quant score34 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Professor's Research (Professor Magnolia)Sword & Shield · 201$4.96▼-9.2%64Quant score64 / 100▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zacian VSword & Shield · 195$5.73·0.0%33Quant score33 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Torkoal VSword & Shield · 188$4.82▼-0.4%49Quant score49 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zamazenta VSword & Shield · 196$5.31▼-1.8%44Quant score44 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.BedeSword & Shield · 199$2.95▼-0.3%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Lapras VSword & Shield · 189$6.49·0.0%70Quant score70 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Stonjourner VSword & Shield · 193$1.83·0.0%69Quant score69 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Team Yell GruntSword & Shield · 202$3.14▲+0.6%50Quant score50 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Cramorant VSword & Shield · 198$2.16▼-3.1%21Quant score21 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Wobbuffet VSword & Shield · 191$4.96▲+0.2%40Quant score40 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Dhelmise VSword & Shield · 187$3.73▲+3.0%53Quant score53 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Indeedee VSword & Shield · 192$2.40▼-1.2%58Quant score58 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Standard-art VMAX out of the rare slot — a short tier, often carried by one card.

Hit rate

1 in 24

Any one

about 1 in 142

Top

$45.75

Median

$2.86

Tier total

$57.19

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 6 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Snorlax VMAXSword & Shield · 142$45.75▲+10.2%47Quant score47 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Lapras VMAXSword & Shield · 50$5.03▲+2.7%47Quant score47 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Morpeko VMAXSword & Shield · 80$4.29▼-0.5%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Stonjourner VMAXSword & Shield · 116$1.43·0.0%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.CinderaceSword & Shield · 35 · Holo$0.37·0.0%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.CinderaceSword & Shield · 34 · Holo$0.32▲+3.2%N/AQuant score — not availableToo few of the sub-scores resolved on this instrument to compose one. An honest absence: a partial composite would rank it against cards the model knows far more about.

The base V cards. Out of the same slot as everything above, and usually the cheapest thing in it.

Hit rate

1 in 8

Any one

about 1 in 144

Top

$9.63

Median

$1.00

Tier total

$28.94

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 17 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Snorlax VSword & Shield · 141$9.63▲+7.1%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Lapras VSword & Shield · 49$3.25▼-1.2%67Quant score67 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Celebi VSword & Shield · 1$1.68▼-1.2%47Quant score47 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Morpeko VSword & Shield · 79$1.09▼-0.9%54Quant score54 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Sableye VSword & Shield · 120$1.74▼-1.1%37Quant score37 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Keldeo VSword & Shield · 53$1.09▲+1.9%45Quant score45 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Victini VSword & Shield · 25$1.00▲+1.0%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Wobbuffet VSword & Shield · 86$1.31▲+8.3%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zacian VSword & Shield · 138$0.98·0.0%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Dhelmise VSword & Shield · 9$0.69·0.0%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Torkoal VSword & Shield · 24$0.93·0.0%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Indeedee VSword & Shield · 91$0.92▼-1.1%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Tapu Koko VSword & Shield · 72$1.14▲+4.6%72Quant score72 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Regirock VSword & Shield · 104$0.97·0.0%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zamazenta VSword & Shield · 139$0.94▼-3.1%36Quant score36 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Stonjourner VSword & Shield · 115$0.71▼-4.1%19Quant score19 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Cramorant VSword & Shield · 155$0.87▲+1.2%17Quant score17 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.