Shining Fates Pull Rates & Hits

Numbered above the set’s main run — the rainbow foils, the golds and the alternate arts. Pokémon files all of them under one label, so the market can price two cards in this tier hundreds of times apart.

Hit rate

1 in 48

Any one

about 1 in 48

Top

$3.78

Median

$3.78

Tier total

$3.78

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 1 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Alcremie VMAXShining Fates · 73$3.78▼-9.6%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.

Hit rate

1 in 26

Any one

about 1 in 285

Top

$9.23

Median

$1.74

Tier total

$35.79

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 11 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.SkylaShining Fates · 72$8.39▼-1.6%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Poké KidShining Fates · 70$9.23·0.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Ball GuyShining Fates · 65$3.52·0.0%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Bird KeeperShining Fates · 66$2.09▲+2.0%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Gym TrainerShining Fates · 68$1.04·0.0%60Quant score60 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Cara LissShining Fates · 67$1.23·0.0%54Quant score54 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Dhelmise VMAXShining Fates · 10$1.42▲+1.4%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Dhelmise VShining Fates · 9$0.73▼-1.4%74Quant score74 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Alcremie VShining Fates · 64$5.40▲+0.2%40Quant score40 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.RoseShining Fates · 71$1.00▲+1.0%50Quant score50 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.PiersShining Fates · 69$1.74▼-4.4%34Quant score34 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Standard-art VMAX out of the rare slot — a short tier, often carried by one card.

Hit rate

1 in 24

Any one

about 1 in 118

Top

$5.48

Median

$1.54

Tier total

$13.69

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 5 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Ditto VMAXShining Fates · 51$5.48·0.0%75Quant score75 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Morpeko VMAXShining Fates · 38$3.98·0.0%69Quant score69 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Cinderace VMAXShining Fates · 19$1.54·0.0%34Quant score34 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Cramorant VMAXShining Fates · 55$1.20▼-7.7%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Crobat VMAXShining Fates · 45$1.49▲+1.4%44Quant score44 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

The base V cards. Out of the same slot as everything above, and usually the cheapest thing in it.

Hit rate

1 in 8

Any one

about 1 in 59

Top

$1.79

Median

$0.72

Tier total

$6.28

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 7 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Morpeko VShining Fates · 37$1.11·0.0%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Ditto VShining Fates · 50$1.79▼-0.6%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Cinderace VShining Fates · 18$0.76▲+2.7%65Quant score65 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Cramorant VShining Fates · 54$0.61▲+1.7%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Crobat VShining Fates · 44$0.72▲+2.9%32Quant score32 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Indeedee VShining Fates · 39$0.68▲+3.0%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Greedent VShining Fates · 53$0.61·0.0%16Quant score16 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

The splatter-art Amazing Rare — a short-lived treatment that appears in only a handful of sets.

Hit rate

never measured

Top

$4.18

Median

$2.94

Tier total

$9.03

▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.KyogreShining Fates · 21$4.18▼-3.7%82Quant score82 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.ReshiramShining Fates · 17$2.94·0.0%91Quant score91 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.YveltalShining Fates · 46$1.91·0.0%93Quant score93 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.