👇 Find the featured cards in each pack
Explore the cards that can land in the hit slot, grouped by rarity with pull-rate context and live prices. Use the full set view to see every other card.
A Sword & Shield pack puts a hit in slot 1 and slot 10, and about 1 in 8 packs holds one of the 1 rarities below. 17 of the set's 216 cards can fill them. The best of them is Snorlax V #141 at $9.34 — a card you would open once in 144 packs. Nobody has published a pull-rate study of Sword & Shield, so these rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal.
Rates marked EST. are estimated: no pull-rate study of Sword & Shield has been published, so the figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Good to about a tier, not to a decimal. Measured rates come from TCGplayer’s Authentication Center pack openings.
Published by Pokémon for the Sword & Shield era. Slot 1 is a hit slot too — most guides miss this. States which rarities each slot may hold, not how often. The figures are for the digital Pokémon TCG Live pack and are believed, not confirmed, to mirror the physical one.
The base V cards. Out of the same slot as everything above, and usually the cheapest thing in it.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 17 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Snorlax VSword & Shield · 141$9.34+0.2%61Quant score61 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Lapras VSword & Shield · 49$2.98-1.3%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Celebi VSword & Shield · 1$1.76-0.6%48Quant score48 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Sableye VSword & Shield · 120$1.78-1.7%46Quant score46 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Morpeko VSword & Shield · 79$1.090.0%49Quant score49 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Wobbuffet VSword & Shield · 86$1.31-2.2%70Quant score70 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Keldeo VSword & Shield · 53$1.13+1.8%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zacian VSword & Shield · 138$0.94-3.1%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Victini VSword & Shield · 25$1.010.0%33Quant score33 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Dhelmise VSword & Shield · 9$0.720.0%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Regirock VSword & Shield · 104$0.95-2.1%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Indeedee VSword & Shield · 91$1.02+8.5%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Torkoal VSword & Shield · 24$0.96-1.0%51Quant score51 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Tapu Koko VSword & Shield · 72$1.120.0%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Zamazenta VSword & Shield · 139$0.90-1.1%20Quant score20 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Cramorant VSword & Shield · 155$0.86+1.2%15Quant score15 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Stonjourner VSword & Shield · 115$0.710.0%12Quant score12 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.About 11.8% of Sword & Shield booster packs — about 1 in 8 — contain a card from one of the 1 hit rarities in the set. Holo Rare V Cards: about 1 in 8 packs. These rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era; no pull-rate study of this set has been published.
17 of the 216 cards in Sword & Shield are at a rarity a booster pack's hit slot can produce — Ultra Rare and above. The rest come out of the common, uncommon, reverse-holo and standard rare slots.
The rarest tier is Holo Rare V Cards in Sword & Shield, at about 1 in 8 packs for any one of its 17 cards. A NAMED card from that tier is about 1 in 144 packs, assuming the tier's cards appear equally often.