Obsidian Flames Pull Rates & Hits

The gold cards at the very end of the numbering. One of the two rarities that sit above the set’s own card count.

Hit rate

1 in 148

Any one

about 1 in 443

Top

$34.99

Median

$2.87

Tier total

$39.06

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 3 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Charizard exObsidian Flames · 228$34.99·0.0%80Quant score80 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Basic Fire EnergyObsidian Flames · 230$2.87▼-16.3%51Quant score51 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.ArtazonObsidian Flames · 229$1.20▼-4.0%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Full-bleed alternate artwork above the numbered run. The smallest tier in most sets and usually the one carrying most of the money.

Hit rate

1 in 88

Any one

about 1 in 528

Top

$84.99

Median

$5.12

Tier total

$116.20

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 6 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Charizard exObsidian Flames · 223$84.99▲+2.4%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Pidgeot exObsidian Flames · 225$15.18▼-0.1%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Eiscue exObsidian Flames · 222$5.56▼-0.4%59Quant score59 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Revavroom exObsidian Flames · 224$4.68▲+3.1%63Quant score63 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.GeetaObsidian Flames · 226$2.94▲+2.4%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.PoppyObsidian Flames · 227$2.85·0.0%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.

Hit rate

1 in 15

Any one

about 1 in 181

Top

$21.60

Median

$1.32

Tier total

$40.28

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 12 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Charizard exObsidian Flames · 215$21.60▲+0.9%66Quant score66 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Tyranitar exObsidian Flames · 211$5.36▼-0.4%76Quant score76 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Absol exObsidian Flames · 214$2.88▼-1.4%72Quant score72 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Pidgeot exObsidian Flames · 217$1.95▲+6.0%67Quant score67 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Eiscue exObsidian Flames · 210$1.46▲+2.1%36Quant score36 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.GeetaObsidian Flames · 218$0.91▲+7.1%36Quant score36 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Vespiquen exObsidian Flames · 212$1.25▼-5.3%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.PoppyObsidian Flames · 220$1.38▲+6.2%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.OrtegaObsidian Flames · 219$1.14·0.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Glimmora exObsidian Flames · 213$0.79·0.0%36Quant score36 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.RymeObsidian Flames · 221$0.63▲+5.0%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Revavroom exObsidian Flames · 216$0.93·0.0%78Quant score78 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

Story-art Pokémon printed just above the ex cards. Common enough to see regularly, which is what makes this tier the clearest demonstration that rare and valuable are different words.

Hit rate

1 in 13

Any one

about 1 in 151

Top

$34.80

Median

$10.67

Tier total

$153.90

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 12 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.CleffaObsidian Flames · 202$34.80—58Quant score58 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.NinetalesObsidian Flames · 199$32.36▼-1.9%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.GloomObsidian Flames · 198$17.50·0.0%53Quant score53 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.PidgeyObsidian Flames · 207$11.02▼-3.6%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.ScizorObsidian Flames · 205$10.97▼-15.6%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.HoundourObsidian Flames · 204$10.63▲+2.9%74Quant score74 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.PidgeottoObsidian Flames · 208$9.48·0.0%47Quant score47 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.LechonkObsidian Flames · 209$10.71▲+4.5%54Quant score54 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.PalafinObsidian Flames · 200$3.30▼-0.3%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.BelliboltObsidian Flames · 201$5.00▼-0.8%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.LarvitarObsidian Flames · 203$5.41▼-1.5%63Quant score63 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.VaroomObsidian Flames · 206$2.72▲+2.6%51Quant score51 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.

The base ex cards. Structurally a hit — same slot, its own published rate — but usually priced like a holo.

Hit rate

1 in 6

Any one

about 1 in 117

Top

$6.04

Median

$0.90

Tier total

$28.49

"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 21 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.

▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Charizard exObsidian Flames · 125 · Holo$6.04—88Quant score88 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Dragonite exObsidian Flames · 159$3.53▼-1.4%78Quant score78 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Pawmot exObsidian Flames · 073$0.52▼-1.9%35Quant score35 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Pidgeot exObsidian Flames · 164 · Holo$1.46▼-5.8%60Quant score60 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Tyranitar exObsidian Flames · 066 · Holo$1.38▼-4.8%47Quant score47 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Clefable exObsidian Flames · 082$1.61▼-1.8%66Quant score66 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Absol exObsidian Flames · 135$1.69▼-1.2%77Quant score77 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Houndoom exObsidian Flames · 134$1.22▲+0.8%77Quant score77 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Miraidon exObsidian Flames · 079$0.98▲+3.2%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Melmetal exObsidian Flames · 153$0.88·0.0%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Decidueye exObsidian Flames · 015 · Holo$0.90▲+4.7%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Koraidon exObsidian Flames · 124$0.81▲+2.5%61Quant score61 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Victini exObsidian Flames · 033$1.08▼-0.9%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Eiscue exObsidian Flames · 042 · Holo$0.86▲+2.4%38Quant score38 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▁Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Houndstone exObsidian Flames · 102$0.98·0.0%37Quant score37 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▲MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Klawf exObsidian Flames · 120$0.86▲+4.9%50Quant score50 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Glimmora exObsidian Flames · 123$0.63▲+1.6%23Quant score23 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Vespiquen exObsidian Flames · 096$0.82▼-8.9%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Greedent exObsidian Flames · 179$0.88▼-3.3%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Revavroom exObsidian Flames · 156$0.65▲+1.6%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.▼FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Toedscruel exObsidian Flames · 022 · Holo$0.71·0.0%18Quant score18 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.