👇 Find the featured cards in each pack
Explore the cards that can land in the hit slot, grouped by rarity with pull-rate context and live prices. Use the full set view to see every other card.
A Battle Styles pack puts a hit in slot 1 and slot 10, and about 1 in 5 packs holds one of the 4 rarities below. 60 of the set's 183 cards can fill them. The best of them is Tyranitar V #155 at $233.65 — a card you would open once in 570 packs. 3 trade above $50; the rest are worth about $0.91 each. Nobody has published a pull-rate study of Battle Styles, so these rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal.
Rates marked EST. are estimated: no pull-rate study of Battle Styles has been published, so the figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Good to about a tier, not to a decimal. Measured rates come from TCGplayer’s Authentication Center pack openings.
Published by Pokémon for the Sword & Shield era. Slot 1 is a hit slot too — most guides miss this. States which rarities each slot may hold, not how often. The figures are for the digital Pokémon TCG Live pack and are believed, not confirmed, to mirror the physical one.
Numbered above the set’s main run — the rainbow foils, the golds and the alternate arts. Pokémon files all of them under one label, so the market can price two cards in this tier hundreds of times apart.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 20 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Rapid Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 170$77.320.0%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.HoundoomBattle Styles · 179$27.03+0.1%59Quant score59 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Single Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 168$30.31-0.3%62Quant score62 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.CherylBattle Styles · 173$8.530.0%77Quant score77 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Flapple VMAXBattle Styles · 164$11.140.0%42Quant score42 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Korrina's FocusBattle Styles · 174$8.030.0%66Quant score66 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Level BallBattle Styles · 181$6.160.0%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.PhoebeBattle Styles · 175$9.820.0%42Quant score42 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.OctilleryBattle Styles · 178$6.860.0%80Quant score80 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Victini VMAXBattle Styles · 165$17.59-0.7%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Rapid Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 169$11.070.0%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.BrunoBattle Styles · 172$5.330.0%44Quant score44 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Rapid Strike Style MustardBattle Styles · 176$4.100.0%75Quant score75 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Exp. ShareBattle Styles · 180$2.39-0.4%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Single Strike Style MustardBattle Styles · 177$3.86+0.5%37Quant score37 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Tapu Koko VMAXBattle Styles · 166$7.37-0.9%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Single Strike EnergyBattle Styles · 183$1.98+4.2%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Single Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 167$12.450.0%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Rapid Strike EnergyBattle Styles · 182$2.06-4.2%23Quant score23 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Corviknight VMAXBattle Styles · 171$12.740.0%62Quant score62 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 22 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Tyranitar VBattle Styles · 155$233.650.0%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Empoleon VBattle Styles · 146$62.820.0%51Quant score51 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Mimikyu VBattle Styles · 148$47.580.0%73Quant score73 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.PhoebeBattle Styles · 161$15.54+0.8%58Quant score58 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Single Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 151$18.54+0.1%36Quant score36 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Rapid Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 153$15.76-0.3%32Quant score32 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Tyranitar VBattle Styles · 154$11.98-0.1%57Quant score57 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.CherylBattle Styles · 159$7.420.0%35Quant score35 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Corviknight VBattle Styles · 156$8.100.0%70Quant score70 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Necrozma VBattle Styles · 149$5.34-0.4%61Quant score61 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Korrina's FocusBattle Styles · 160$4.260.0%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Empoleon VBattle Styles · 145$5.330.0%45Quant score45 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Flapple VBattle Styles · 143$4.180.0%27Quant score27 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.BrunoBattle Styles · 158$2.630.0%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Tapu Koko VBattle Styles · 147$3.040.0%26Quant score26 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Stoutland VBattle Styles · 157$3.520.0%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Victini VBattle Styles · 144$11.980.0%23Quant score23 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Single Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 150$4.360.0%23Quant score23 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Rapid Strike Style MustardBattle Styles · 162$1.440.0%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Kricketune VBattle Styles · 142$3.300.0%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Single Strike Style MustardBattle Styles · 163$1.390.0%18Quant score18 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Rapid Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 152$4.180.0%24Quant score24 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.Standard-art VMAX out of the rare slot — a short tier, often carried by one card.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 6 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Victini VMAXBattle Styles · 22$3.370.0%41Quant score41 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Rapid Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 88 · Holo$1.460.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Single Strike Urshifu VMAXBattle Styles · 86 · Holo$1.44+0.7%52Quant score52 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Corviknight VMAXBattle Styles · 110$2.340.0%67Quant score67 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Flapple VMAXBattle Styles · 19$2.45+1.7%45Quant score45 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Tapu Koko VMAXBattle Styles · 51$1.61+2.5%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.The base V cards. Out of the same slot as everything above, and usually the cheapest thing in it.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 12 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Mimikyu VBattle Styles · 62$2.83-0.7%49Quant score49 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Tyranitar VBattle Styles · 97$0.920.0%61Quant score61 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Single Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 85$0.730.0%50Quant score50 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Rapid Strike Urshifu VBattle Styles · 87$0.78+2.6%55Quant score55 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Necrozma VBattle Styles · 63$1.440.0%33Quant score33 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Victini VBattle Styles · 21$0.99+5.3%48Quant score48 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Flapple VBattle Styles · 18$0.90-3.2%31Quant score31 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Stoutland VBattle Styles · 117$0.680.0%42Quant score42 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Empoleon VBattle Styles · 40$0.91+2.2%37Quant score37 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Tapu Koko VBattle Styles · 50$0.89-5.3%43Quant score43 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Corviknight VBattle Styles · 109$0.96+1.1%25Quant score25 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Kricketune VBattle Styles · 6$0.89-2.2%67Quant score67 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.About 20.5% of Battle Styles booster packs — about 1 in 5 — contain a card from one of the 4 hit rarities in the set. Secret Rares: about 1 in 48 packs. Ultra Rares: about 1 in 26 packs. Holo Rare VMAX Cards: about 1 in 24 packs. Holo Rare V Cards: about 1 in 8 packs. These rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era; no pull-rate study of this set has been published.
60 of the 183 cards in Battle Styles are at a rarity a booster pack's hit slot can produce — Ultra Rare and above. The rest come out of the common, uncommon, reverse-holo and standard rare slots.
The rarest tier is Secret Rares in Battle Styles, at about 1 in 48 packs for any one of its 20 cards. A NAMED card from that tier is about 1 in 958 packs, assuming the tier's cards appear equally often.