👇 Find the featured cards in each pack
Explore the cards that can land in the hit slot, grouped by rarity with pull-rate context and live prices. Use the full set view to see every other card.
A Sword & Shield pack puts a hit in slot 1 and slot 10, and about 1 in 26 packs holds one of the 1 rarities below. 16 of the set's 216 cards can fill them. The best of them is Snorlax V #197 at $34.92 — a card you would open once in 415 packs. Nobody has published a pull-rate study of Sword & Shield, so these rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal.
Rates marked EST. are estimated: no pull-rate study of Sword & Shield has been published, so the figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Good to about a tier, not to a decimal. Measured rates come from TCGplayer’s Authentication Center pack openings.
Published by Pokémon for the Sword & Shield era. Slot 1 is a hit slot too — most guides miss this. States which rarities each slot may hold, not how often. The figures are for the digital Pokémon TCG Live pack and are believed, not confirmed, to mirror the physical one.
Full-art Pokémon and Supporter cards inside the numbered run. The tier where a chase card is still affordable.
"Specific card" splits the tier's rate evenly across its 16 cards. Real spread within one tier runs to ±30%.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Snorlax VSword & Shield · 197$33.080.0%26Quant score26 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Sableye VSword & Shield · 194$11.990.0%28Quant score28 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Lapras VSword & Shield · 189$7.420.0%81Quant score81 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Morpeko VSword & Shield · 190$12.350.0%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.MarnieSword & Shield · 200$34.920.0%68Quant score68 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Professor's Research (Professor Magnolia)Sword & Shield · 201$4.610.0%39Quant score39 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.BedeSword & Shield · 199$2.970.0%56Quant score56 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Wobbuffet VSword & Shield · 191$5.180.0%76Quant score76 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Dhelmise VSword & Shield · 187$3.690.0%60Quant score60 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Team Yell GruntSword & Shield · 202$3.260.0%77Quant score77 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Torkoal VSword & Shield · 188$4.760.0%29Quant score29 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Cramorant VSword & Shield · 198$2.020.0%30Quant score30 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Floor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.Zacian VSword & Shield · 195$6.030.0%64Quant score64 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
MarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.Indeedee VSword & Shield · 192$2.350.0%72Quant score72 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
FallingPrice is declining with no absorption corroborating it — the default bearish read when nothing stronger fires. It says the trend, not how far it has left to run.Stonjourner VSword & Shield · 193$1.740.0%33Quant score33 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.
Zamazenta VSword & Shield · 196$4.500.0%20Quant score20 / 100A 0-100 composite of the sub-scores — liquidity, trend, value, supply and risk — each computed on this instrument’s own evidence and reweighted when an input is missing rather than filled with a neutral 50. Higher is better; it ranks instruments against each other, and is never a price target.About 3.9% of Sword & Shield booster packs — about 1 in 26 — contain a card from one of the 1 hit rarities in the set. Ultra Rares: about 1 in 26 packs. These rates are estimated from measured sets of the same era; no pull-rate study of this set has been published.
16 of the 216 cards in Sword & Shield are at a rarity a booster pack's hit slot can produce — Ultra Rare and above. The rest come out of the common, uncommon, reverse-holo and standard rare slots.
The rarest tier is Ultra Rares in Sword & Shield, at about 1 in 26 packs for any one of its 16 cards. A NAMED card from that tier is about 1 in 415 packs, assuming the tier's cards appear equally often.