Leafeon — BW87Raw · Normal · Near MintEvery price, print, listing and score on this page belongs to this one printing in this one condition or grade — switch either dropdown and you are looking at a different one.
The condition or grade being priced. Each one is a separate instrument that trades at its own price, so choosing one replaces every figure on the page. “All conditions” and “All grades” are a union of the siblings — their tape, listings and volume are combined, with one sibling named as the reference for price and analytics.
∅Illiquid / UnknownIlliquid / UnknownThe classifier refused to call one: too little liquidity or too small a sample to test any rule. The absence of a read, never a tenth regime.As of 17:50ZAs of 17:50ZThe market price, its 1D/7D/30D returns, the order book, the For Sale counts and today’s price bar as they stood when this page was built. The page itself is served from a shared cache, so this stamp — not the moment you loaded it — is how old these numbers are. Your browser re-reads them a moment after the page arrives and this line follows.
Mkt Price
$84.25item—
modelled guide
Mkt Price$84.25 itemThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. It is quoted on the ITEM basis — the basis every wall tile is quoted on — and it is what the chart plots on a day with no print of its own.
Fair ValueN/A
Fair ValueN/ANo fair value is published for this instrument: no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book. The components below show what evidence exists; the estimate they would blend to is withheld rather than quoted. A weighted blend of independent estimates, quoted DELIVERED — item plus required shipping — where Mkt Price beside it may be item basis. Read the band, not the point: its width is the model's own confidence.
LiquidityN/A
LiquidityN/AHow easily a position clears, scored 0–100. Four readings, equally weighted, each independently nullable: trade rate (the chance it trades today, from 30d units sold), trade breadth (how many of the last 30 days carried a trade), queue clearance (30d units sold against the units on the board) and seller dispersion (how many different people are selling it). A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight — never filled in with a zero.
30D Vol
15units▼-6.2%
units · vs prior 30d
30D Vol15 units15 units over the last 30 days, on eBay. Newest reading Oct 7, 2026. Against 16 in the 30 days before.
For Sale
0units
live delivered asks
For Sale0 unitsEvery active fixed-price ask with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and are never counted here.
Graded Pop
1,135▲+0.4%
across 3 graders
Graded Pop1,135Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds a copy grades 10.
No live auction bids — this market has no resting bid book.
Cross-Market BasisNo ask ladder was available for this instrument, so the ask side is empty. No bid side exists: this market has no resting bid book. There are no live auction bids and no published buylist for this instrument, so the bid side is empty rather than synthesized from asks, price history or a spread assumption.——
No active listings.
Ask depth—Ask depth—Every live fixed-price ask summed at its DELIVERED price — what clearing the whole visible book would cost. There is no bid side to set it against: no auction has a bid on it and no buylist quotes this instrument, and an absent side is never drawn as a zero.
One candle per UTC day — the finest grain this market recordsOne candle per ISO week (Mon–Sun), rolled up from the daily barsOne candle per calendar month, rolled up from the daily barsitem — the sale price alone, excluding shipping. This is the basis TCGplayer’s own market guide is published on, and the basis every wall tile, screener row and watchlist quote uses, so it is what the headline compares against.delivered — item + required shipping, the basis every alarm, floor and fair value uses. A print whose shipping the venue never stated has no delivered price and is excluded from the bar rather than counted at its item price; a day with no priced print falls back to the guide, which is an item price and says so.
How each period is drawn. Candles and bars show the full observed open/high/low/close; line and area show the close alone. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
No fair value is published for this card — no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book.
Market safety
—No bookNo visible asks, so there is no control cost to band.
Nothing is listed for sale, so there is no book for one buyer to move.
Flow
Steady
Supply
▲Nothing listedNo active fixed-price ask carries a known delivered price right now. Anyone who wants one has to bid for it or wait.
0 units listed — 0.0d of stock at the 30-day pace of 0.5/day.
PopulationAll graders pooled1,135Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, as each of them states its own total. A share of what was submitted and kept — never the odds a copy grades 10.ACE20Slabs ACE itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.CGC184Slabs CGC itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.PSA931Slabs PSA itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.
1010 — 11 slabs, 1.0% of the 1,135 charted herePSA 1199 — 148 slabs, 13.0% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 1 · CGC 14 · PSA 1338.58.5 — 42 slabs, 3.7% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 4288 — 404 slabs, 35.6% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 42 · PSA 3587.57.5 — 34 slabs, 3.0% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 3477 — 236 slabs, 20.8% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 17 · PSA 2156.56.5 — 14 slabs, 1.2% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 1466 — 137 slabs, 12.1% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 5 · CGC 9 · PSA 1235.55.5 — 4 slabs, 0.4% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 455 — 73 slabs, 6.4% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 4 · PSA 654.54.5 — 2 slabs, 0.2% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 244 — 19 slabs, 1.7% of the 1,135 charted hereACE 2 · CGC 1 · PSA 163.53.5 — 1 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,135 charted hereCGC 133 — 8 slabs, 0.7% of the 1,135 charted herePSA 822 — 1 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,135 charted herePSA 111 — 1 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,135 charted herePSA 1
Listed0 unitsActive fixed-price asks with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and never enter this count.Sold · 30d · 0.5/day15 unitsUnits over the last 30 days, on eBay, against 16 in the 30 days before. Newest reading 2026-10-07.Graded · ACE 20 · CGC 184 · PSA 9311,135 slabsEvery slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Print scarcity
•Set not coveredA set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. this set does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
A set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. this set does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
Competitive play•Fringe0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days, measured play below the 5% regular threshold.
0.0%+0.0 ppChange in share against the 30-day window ending September 13, 2026, in percentage points.In 3 of 22,383 Standard decklists across 338 events, last 30 days · 2.0 copies per deck that plays it.
Copies2.0Mean copies per deck that runs it, over the 3 decks that do; never averaged against the decks that do not. The bar is scaled to 4, the per-deck limit.
Why It's Moving
What changedWhat changedThe observable that moved, stated before any reason for it — the fact the rest of this panel has to account for.
Modelled guide price moved +0.0% over the trailing 7 days and +0.0% over 30 days, now at $84.25. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanationPrimary explanationThe reading the evidence best supports. It is an explanation, never a forecast, and it is only as good as the Evidence row two lines down.
Primary read: Price trend scored 97/100 (composite weight 39%). — the largest single contributor to the current ILLIQUID_UNKNOWN regime read.
AlternativeAlternativeA competing explanation the SAME evidence would also support. It is printed even when the primary looks strong: an explanation with no stated alternative is a story, not an analysis.
Alternative explanation: Relative strength scored 79/100 (composite weight 27%).. With 0 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, either read is defensible — this is not a high-conviction single-cause move.
EvidenceEvidenceWhat kind of fact this row is. A completed sale, a live ask and a calculated guide price are three different weights of evidence about the same number, and this column is the difference between them.
ObservedObservedThe day the fact was read — not the day the underlying event happened, and not today. An old date is an old reading.
AgeAgeHow long ago this row was read, as of the moment the page was computed.
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight this row carries where it feeds a model, from the resolver that matched it. Lower means a looser match or a thinner source, and a low-confidence row is reweighted rather than dropped.
ModelledModelledYes = a CALCULATED value (a guide price, an estimate); No = something actually observed (a sale, a listing, a census count). A modelled row is evidence about a model, not about the market.
This week's daily sold units overlap the middle half of the rest of the window, so no change in pace is separable from the noise. Trading at its own normal rate.
4 sold in 7d, 1.1× the 30d pace — 30d prints clear at $39.99 median.
This week 4 · last week 4 · 30d/wk 4
Recent prints
$44.006d ago$44.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-07T07:00:00.000Z$30.007d ago$30.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-06T07:00:00.000Z$34.0012d ago$34.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z$52.9912d ago$52.99 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z$76.0013d ago$76.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z$30.0015d ago$30.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Method▾
Daily units are the venue's own sold-quantity history, expanded off each bucket's real span, plus confirmed prints from the other side of the market. Prints come from the live sales tape at delivered prices. The floor is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same one FAIR VALUE prices against.
Bottom line
—No callUnder half the model had evidence, so the score is a statement about the inputs that reported rather than about the card. No call until more of them do.
83/100 across 3 of 11 inputs. For: price trend reads 97/100. That is under half the model, so no call is made on it.
Price trend97Price trend97/1007-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Carries 13% of the composite.Relative strength79Relative strength79/100This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Carries 7% of the composite.Grading upside50Grading upside50/100Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Carries 6% of the composite.
3 of 11 inputs · 26% weight · -35% confidence▾
Not reading yet: value vs fair, money flow, book pressure, liquidity, manipulation risk, seller concentration, reprint risk, scarcity.
Price trend13%977-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Relative strength7%79This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Grading upside6%50Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Value vs fair17%no readingFair value returned UNKNOWN — too few comparable prints to anchor an estimate.
Slab premium
▲Strong slab premiumThe dearest priced rung is PSA 9 at $650.00, 7.7× the $84.25 raw reference (modelled guide price).
A PSA 9 is worth $650.00 — 7.7× the $84.25 raw modelled guide price.
Dearest slab per grading company
PSA 9$650.007.7×PSA 9 — $650.00, 7.7× raw$1,750.00 · FANATICS · 2026-10-09 · $650.00 · FANATICS · 2026-09-18 · $350.00 · EBAY · 2026-08-04BGS 9$400.004.7×BGS 9 — $400.00, 4.7× raw$400.00 · EBAY · 2026-07-19CGC 8$71.500.8×CGC 8 — $71.50, 0.8× raw$94.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-07 · $49.00 · EBAY · 2026-07-20Raw$84.25guideThe provider’s MODELLED value for this grade — not a sale and not even an offer. Often extrapolated from the grades that did sell.1.0×Raw — $84.25, 1.0× rawThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. Every multiple on this ladder is taken against it.
PSA 9 is the dearest slab on the board at $650.00; the next priced grader is BGS 9 at $400.00.
One rung down, a PSA 10 is $560.00 — 6.6× raw.
ACE (20 slabs) has no priced comp at any grade — nothing has been paid for one we can see.
Grading ROI
▼Don't gradePSA: -$81.63 expected after $84.99 of fees — break-even needs 21% gems; observed 1% (95% floor 1%, n=931).
Best on PSA: -$81.63 expected after $84.99 of fees — break-even needs 21% gems; observed 1% (95% floor 1%, n=931).
Odds of a 10 vs what it takes
PSA needs 21% tens to break even; the census shows 1%, with a 95% interval of 1% to 2% on 931 slabs.
break-even 21.4%Break-even21.4%The 10 rate this submission would need just to cover the raw price and the fee. It is the white line on the meter above: the solid segment has to clear it before grading is worth doing at all.observed 1.2% [0.7%–2.1%] n=931Observed 10 rate1.2%Measured over 931 graded copies in the census, with a 95% interval of 0.7%–2.1% around it — the band on the meter IS that interval, and it is the width of the doubt, not of the opportunity. A small n makes it wide.
VendorVendorThe grading company, one row each. Rows are the graders we hold both a fee schedule and a population census for — a grader we cannot price is left out rather than estimated.
FeeFeeThe all-in submission cost per card at this grader: grading tier plus shipping both ways and insurance, as published. A † marks a fee we could not read from a published schedule and had to carry from a prior reading. Lower is better.
P(10)P(10)The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
10 price10 priceWhat a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
ROI(10)ROI(10)Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
Pre-grade this card →Photograph your own copy front and back for centering, wear and the odds of each grade. An estimate, not a grade.
$84.25 raw (modelled guide price) + $59.99 PSA Standard + $25.00 ship/ins = $169.24 · less 13.25% sale fee · 45d lockup
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Graded copies
1,135 copies
Slabs on record across PSA, CGC and ACE, summed over every grade. The model’s raw input — it is NOT the print run, because a card people grade often will show a large population off a small press run. Ungraded and sealed copies are invisible to it.
Method▾
Graded population is print run × how often anyone bothers grading it, and the second factor moves with VALUE — so population is divided by price^0.606, the elasticity fitted across 3,826 cards that carry a population, a price and a pull rate at once. That normalised count is turned into a SET pack scale using the card’s pull rate (every card in a set is an independent read on how many packs exist, pooled by median), then brought back down to this card by its own pull rate. The band is a tertile of the result across every card that clears the gates.
Nobody has ever published a Pokémon print run, and this does not recover one — it is an ORDER, not a count. It reads surviving graded supply across PSA, CGC and ACE, so ungraded and sealed stock are invisible to it. What it is checked against: the model puts Black & White at the bottom of the catalog and modern Scarlet & Violet at the top, which is where the smallest and largest print runs actually are.
Top-cut lift0.00×0% of 3,647 top-cut decklists run it, against 0.0% of the whole field. Above 1.00 it is over-represented where the money is. Withheld under 20 top-cut decklists.
Deck spread0.001 minus the concentration of this card across the deck archetypes that run it. 1.00 is spread evenly over many decks; 0 is one deck. At or above 0.5 concentration this is a ONE-DECK CARD: its demand rises and falls with a single archetype.
Player floor$0.21The cheapest currently-priced Standard-legal print of this card: Leafeon, Twilight Masquerade. What it costs to put the card in a deck, which is not the same question as what THIS print is worth.Premium over floor401×This printing's headline price ($84.25) against the player floor ($0.21). What a player pays for THIS art rather than for the cheapest legal copy of the same card.Playset$0.422.0 copies (the mean per deck that runs it) at the player floor of $0.21. What the decks on file actually bought.30d sold15 units (+7% vs prior 30d)Units of THIS printing sold in the 30 days ending October 13, 2026, against the 30 days before that (14). Demand at a table and demand in the market are different measurements; this is the second one.Meta vs priceρ -0.65 (13 weeks)Spearman rank correlation of weekly share against weekly median price over the trailing 26 weeks, on the weeks carrying both. Printed only at 8 weeks or more; below that the count is stated instead of a coefficient off a handful of readings.
Meta share · % of Standard decklists (right axis)Median price · this print, $ (left axis)Units sold per day (bars)
Does the meta move the price? Share of Standard decklists running this card against this print's median sale price and units sold, day by day; the rank correlation above is printed once 8 weeks exist.
Fringe at 0.0% of Standard decklists, +0.0 pp on the prior window. A playset costs $0.42 at the cheapest legal print.
94.5% of card lines in these decklists matched a card in our catalog; an unmatched line is never counted. Online events only, not Regionals or Worlds. Tournament results →
Card text▾
HP90
TypesGrass
StageStage1
AttacksC Quick Attack · 10Cost: ColorlessFlip a coin. If heads, this attack does 30 more damage.GC Energy Assist · 40Cost: Grass · ColorlessAttach a basic Energy card from your discard pile to 1 of your Benched Pokémon.
WeaknessFire ×2
ResistanceWater -20
Retreat1
LegalStandard ✗not legal · Expanded ✓legal
EvidenceEvidenceThe specific observations the explanation rests on. If this row is thin, treat the explanation as thin — it is the only thing holding it up.
Evidence: item-basis daily bars, TCGplayer active listings, absorption read ("Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).").
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight to put on the primary explanation, given how much of the evidence actually resolved. It qualifies the row above; it never adds to it.
Confidence: 90% (floor-confidence 40/100), based on 971 days of observations.
What would disprove itWhat would disprove itThe observation that would break the primary explanation. It is what makes the reading falsifiable rather than unfalsifiable — and it is the thing to watch for next.
This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.
CatalogCard identity: set, number, rarity, finish, release date. It dates from the printing itself, so an old reading here is expected and is not staleness.
Apr 26, 2011
15.5y
98%
No
Guide priceA calculated market guide — a model of where the product is trading. Never a confirmed sale, and always marked Modelled.
Oct 12, 2026
2d
90%
Yes
Inventory countHow many copies and listings stand on the book. What depth, supply and absorption are measured against.
Sep 12, 2026
32d
70%
No
Population censusA grader's published count of the copies it has slabbed at each grade. A record of what was submitted and kept, never the odds a copy grades.
Oct 11, 2026
2d
60%
No
Raw · Normal · Near MintWhat every row above was gathered for — one printing, in this one finish and condition or grade. Change either switcher in the header and you are reading a different one; the page's own URL is the address of exactly this one.pq-quant-2026.10.0The version of the scoring and analytics formulas that produced everything on this page. Two figures computed under different versions are not comparable, which is why the version is stated rather than assumed.
Money flow
11%
no reading
No confirmed prints with a contemporaneous ask to classify against.
Book pressure11%no readingNeeds a 30-day inventory change, or book counts spanning ≥3 days that move at all and rest on ≥8 listings. Collection of `inventory_observations` began 2026-09-02.
Liquidity9%no readingFewer than two of the four participation readings could be measured — no trade count, and no book to read a queue or a seller base off.
Manipulation risk9%no readingNo visible ask book, so there is no control cost to band.
Scarcity7%no readingNeither scarcity read is available: no pull rate on file for this card’s rarity, and no print-scale estimate for its set (or the set is inside its first 12 months, where graded population has not accumulated yet).
Seller concentration5%no readingThe venue attributes no seller identity to these asks.
Reprint risk5%no readingPrint status is unestablished — no shelf observation and no recorded reprint event.
Competitive meta+2A BONUS on top of the weighted composite, never a penalty: 20% of Standard decklists or more adds 8, 5% or more adds 5, and any measured play at all adds 2. A card nobody plays is not marked down for it. Measured on 0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days.
The bottom line is a weighted mean of the signals that reported, renormalised so their weights sum to 1. Nothing defaults to a neutral 50: an input with no evidence is reweighted away and its absence is charged as a confidence penalty. Risk rows (manipulation, concentration, reprint) enter inverted. Data quality carries no weight at all — it decides whether the verdict may be spoken, because knowing a lot about a card is not a reason to buy it. Competitive meta sits OUTSIDE the weighted mean as a capped bonus added after it: a card nobody plays is never marked down for that, and a card the meta is built on can be marked up for it.
Risk-wtdRisk-wtdThe same return weighted by the odds of each grade, not just the 10 — the number to compare graders on, because a high P(10) at a high fee can lose to a lower one. A leading ≈ means the full grade distribution was unavailable and a coarser method stood in. Higher is better.
ACE
$24.39ACE Basic — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. £18.00 converted at GBP/USD 1.355 (2026-09-01) — a conversion, not a quoted USD price. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Core $16.26, Value $20.33.
0.0%95% interval 0.0%–16.1% on n=20. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for ACE, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no ACE price at grade 10 at any basis.
BGS
$79.95BGS Express — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-09-01. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Base $14.95.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for BGS, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no BGS population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
CGC
$20.00CGC Economy — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Bulk $17.00.
0.0%95% interval 0.0%–2.0% on n=184. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for CGC, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no CGC price at grade 10 at any basis.
PSA
$59.99PSA Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Value Bulk $24.99, Value $32.99.
1.2%95% interval 0.7%–2.1% on n=931. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$560.00What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.guideThe provider’s MODELLED value for this grade — not a sale and not even an offer. Often extrapolated from the grades that did sell.
+187%+$316.56 on a $169.24 cost basis.
≈+1%Only 90% of the PSA distribution is priced, so this falls back to P(10)·ROI(10) + (1−P(10))·ROI(pooled sub-10 price).
