Ninetales #020/132 · Mega Evolution · Price & Chart · PokéQuant

Ninetales — 020/132

Name: Ninetales #020/132
Brand: Pokémon
SKU: raw~tcgdex:me01-020:EN:NORMAL~NM

DEMO

Mkt PriceN/A

Fair ValueN/A

LiquidityN/A

Pop 30DN/A

VelocityN/A

Days InvN/A

No resting bid book — collectibles fixed-price markets have no bids.Auction bids appear here when live.

Cross-Market Basis——

No active listings.

—

Insufficient data

No priced bars on file for this instrument yet.

as of — · UTC · demo fixture

Ninetales — 020/132 · 1DO—H—L—C——plotting daily close

Vol — sold·— prints·— obs

Live Listings

PriceMarkQtyCond

TCGplayer0

eBay0

Asks at delivered prices · cheapest first · unknown shipping unranked

Fair Value

Insufficient data

No fair-value component could be computed for the trailing 30d window (no confirmed prints, no ask ladder, no trend anchor, no completed auctions). No point estimate is offered.

Supply

Raw Listing Supply

—

Graded Population

—

Velocity —Days of inventory —Unknown

Microstructure

Auctions

Insufficient data demand

Not enough completed auctions to price a demand spread for this instrument.

Grading

No graded population or grading economics modelled for this printing.

Absorption / Attention

INSUFFICIENT DATA

Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).

Why It's Moving

What changed: Sold median moved +0.0% over the trailing 7 days and +0.0% over 30 days, last printing at $0.00. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanation: Primary read: no single factor dominates; the composite score is being driven by broad, low-amplitude movement across most inputs.
Alternative: Alternative explanation: with only 0 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, the move could just as easily be sampling noise rather than a durable shift.
Evidence: Evidence: raw~tcgdex:me01-020:EN:NORMAL~NM|SOLD_MEDIAN|TCGPLAYER, raw~tcgdex:me01-020:EN:NORMAL~NM|LISTING_COUNT|TCGPLAYER, absorption read ("Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).").
Confidence: Confidence: 0%, based on 0 days of observations.
What would disprove it: This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.

Recommendation

No recommendation available.

Undervalued Opportunities

Loading opportunities…