Radiant Heatran — 027/189Raw · Holo · Near MintEvery price, print, listing and score on this page belongs to this one printing in this one condition or grade — switch either dropdown and you are looking at a different one.
The condition or grade being priced. Each one is a separate instrument that trades at its own price, so choosing one replaces every figure on the page. “All conditions” and “All grades” are a union of the siblings — their tape, listings and volume are combined, with one sibling named as the reference for price and analytics.
▲MarkupMarkupA sustained positive trend with inventory under control — the book is not refilling as fast as it is being taken.▾UndervaluedUndervaluedThe market price sits below the blended fair-value band — not merely below its midpoint. The blend and its four components are on the FAIR VALUE card; the wider the band, the weaker this call.⇈AccumulationAccumulationBoth directions agree over the flow window: net dollars cleared at or above the prevailing ask, AND the top-decile-notional prints skewed the same way. Direction of confirmed prints only — never a forecast.1D—1D return—No bar 1 observation back, so there is nothing to measure against — an absence, not a flat market.7D+6.0%7D return+6.0%Change in the headline market price against the close 7 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.30D+1.9%30D return+1.9%Change in the headline market price against the close 30 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.As of 14:06ZAs of 14:06ZThe market price, its 1D/7D/30D returns, the order book, the For Sale counts and today’s price bar as they stood when this page was built. The page itself is served from a shared cache, so this stamp — not the moment you loaded it — is how old these numbers are. Your browser re-reads them a moment after the page arrives and this line follows.
Mkt Price
$0.53item—
Last $0.40 · 4d
Mkt Price$0.53 itemThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. It is quoted on the ITEM basis — the basis every wall tile is quoted on — and it is what the chart plots on a day with no print of its own. Last confirmed fixed-price sale: $0.40 at 2026-10-10T20:37:51.487Z. Shipping was free, so delivered is the same number. One trade, not a statistic — the figure above it is the day's median.
Fair Value
$1.22delivered
≈$1.18 item · Band $0.00–$5.10
Fair Value$1.22 deliveredBand is ±319.0% of the point estimate: 1 of 4 components available (excluded: depth clearing, trend anchor — a trailing average on a confirmed rise, auction clearing — 60% of weight reweighted away, 30% confidence penalty), on 59 observation(s) in the trailing 30d. Thin samples and missing components widen the band 2.81x over the raw component spread. No recent clearing price: too few prints in the last 120h to say what it is trading at now. A weighted blend of independent estimates, quoted DELIVERED — item plus required shipping — where Mkt Price beside it may be item basis. Read the band, not the point: its width is the model's own confidence. On the ITEM basis TCGplayer’s guide is quoted on, that is about $1.18 — this card’s own prints carry a median delivered-minus-item wedge of $0.04, measured day by day, never an assumed postage rate.
Liquidity
93/100
Good liquidity
Liquidity93 /100How easily a position clears, scored 0–100. Four readings, equally weighted, each independently nullable: trade rate (the chance it trades today, from 30d units sold), trade breadth (how many of the last 30 days carried a trade), queue clearance (30d units sold against the units on the board) and seller dispersion (how many different people are selling it). A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight — never filled in with a zero.
30D Vol
236units▼-49.0%
units · vs prior 30d
30D Vol236 units236 units over the last 30 days, on TCGplayer and eBay. Newest reading Oct 14, 2026. Against 463 in the 30 days before.
For Sale
0units
live delivered asks
For Sale0 unitsEvery active fixed-price ask with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and are never counted here.
Graded Pop
1,969▲+2.4%
across 3 graders
Graded Pop1,969Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds a copy grades 10.
PSA
How this summary is madeThe first sentence is written by a language model from this card’s own data. The second is computed from the live numbers on this page every time it loads, so it moves with the market.
One candle per UTC day — the finest grain this market recordsOne candle per ISO week (Mon–Sun), rolled up from the daily barsOne candle per calendar month, rolled up from the daily barsitem — the sale price alone, excluding shipping. This is the basis TCGplayer’s own market guide is published on, and the basis every wall tile, screener row and watchlist quote uses, so it is what the headline compares against.delivered — item + required shipping, the basis every alarm, floor and fair value uses. A print whose shipping the venue never stated has no delivered price and is excluded from the bar rather than counted at its item price; a day with no priced print falls back to the guide, which is an item price and says so.
How each period is drawn. Candles and bars show the full observed open/high/low/close; line and area show the close alone. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
Vol 1 sold·1 ebay·0 prints·1 obssingle obs — no range
—
RSI 14
Live Listings
Pricevs MktQtyCond
TCGplayer0
eBay0
Buy on TCGplayer
Fair valueUNDERVALUEDThe cheapest delivered ask sits more than 5% below the blended fair-value estimate (FAIR_VALUE_AT_FAIR_TOLERANCE_PCT).
Fair value $1.22 delivered, about $1.18 on the item basis; the cheapest delivered ask is 67.1% below it$1.22delivered-67.1%The cheapest delivered ask ($0.40) against the blended fair-value estimate.top 5%top 5% of 6,008 tracked on FV gap · Ranked against every tracked card as of Oct 15, 2026; the number above is live.
$0.40
Supply
▲Nothing listedNo active fixed-price ask carries a known delivered price right now. Anyone who wants one has to bid for it or wait.
0 units listed — 0.0d of stock at the 30-day pace of 7.9/day.
PopulationAll graders pooled1,969Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, as each of them states its own total. A share of what was submitted and kept — never the odds a copy grades 10. The bars below sum to 1,975, not 1,969: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.ACE88Slabs ACE itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.CGC959Slabs CGC itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.PSA922Slabs PSA itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve. The bars below sum to 928, not 922: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.
1010 — 1,012 slabs, 51.2% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 59 · CGC 402 (Gem Mint 10 · Perfect 10 · Pristine 10) · PSA 5519.5 — 73 slabs, 3.7% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 7399 — 624 slabs, 31.6% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 16 · CGC 335 · PSA 2738.5 — 96 slabs, 4.9% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 9688 — 102 slabs, 5.2% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 5 · CGC 26 · PSA 717.5 — 11 slabs, 0.6% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 1177 — 25 slabs, 1.3% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 6 · CGC 6 · PSA 136.5 — 2 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 266 — 9 slabs, 0.5% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 2 · PSA 755 — 5 slabs, 0.3% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 1 · PSA 44.5 — 1 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 144 — 5 slabs, 0.3% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 1 · CGC 2 · PSA 222 — 1 slabs, 0.1% of the 1,975 charted hereCGC 1AAuth — 9 slabs, 0.5% of the 1,975 charted hereACE 1 · CGC 1 · PSA 7 (Authentic · qualified)
Listed0 unitsActive fixed-price asks with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and never enter this count.Sold · 30d · 7.9/day236 unitsUnits over the last 30 days, on TCGplayer and eBay, against 463 in the 30 days before. Newest reading 2026-10-14.Graded · ACE 88 · CGC 959 · PSA 9221,969 slabsEvery slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
ScarcityRoutineA named card at this rarity takes 1 in 64 packs on average, which is the commonest fifth of every card we hold pack odds for. The bands are the card-weighted quintiles of that population, not thresholds we picked.
1 in 64 packs for one copy of this card, estimated1 in 64packsestimatedThe Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Half of all openers get one within 44 packs
Commonest of 6 hit tiers in Astral RadianceEvery tier on this ladder comes out of the same pack under the same study, so the position is a like-for-like comparison. It ranks NAMED cards, not tiers: a 12-card tier and a 1-card tier with the same slot odds are not the same difficulty.
Chase
—Pack count unknownA priced sealed product exists, but nothing on record says how many packs are inside it. Defaulting a booster box to 36 packs is true for most modern sets and false for enough of them that the guess would sit invisibly inside a dollar figure, so the card withholds instead.
1 in 21 packs for radiant rare, shared by 3 cards in Astral Radiance — but nothing on record says how many packs are in this set's sealed products, and a guessed pack count would sit invisibly inside the spend figure.
Breakdown
RarityRadiant RareRarityRadiant RareThe provider's own spelling, verbatim. The odds row and this printing have to carry the same string or no estimate is made — a mismatch must produce nothing rather than another rarity's rate.Slot odds
Competitive play▼Not Standard-legalPublished as not legal in Standard, and in none of the 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days. Rotated out of Standard on April 11, 2025.
Not legal in Standard, and in none of the 22,383 Standard decklists across 338 events, last 30 days.
Rotation runwayRotated April 11, 2025Mark F left Standard on that date. Standard rotation dates are curated by hand from official announcements; a mark with no announced date carries none rather than a guess.30d sold245 units (-47% vs prior 30d)Units of THIS printing sold in the 30 days ending October 13, 2026, against the 30 days before that (464). Demand at a table and demand in the market are different measurements; this is the second one.
Why It's Moving
What changedWhat changedThe observable that moved, stated before any reason for it — the fact the rest of this panel has to account for.
Modelled guide price moved +6.0% over the trailing 7 days and +1.9% over 30 days, now at $0.53. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanationPrimary explanationThe reading the evidence best supports. It is an explanation, never a forecast, and it is only as good as the Evidence row two lines down.
Primary read: Relative strength scored 94/100 (composite weight 21%). — the largest single contributor to the current MARKUP regime read.
AlternativeAlternativeA competing explanation the SAME evidence would also support. It is printed even when the primary looks strong: an explanation with no stated alternative is a story, not an analysis.
Alternative explanation: Liquidity scored 93/100 (composite weight 21%).. With 0 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, either read is defensible — this is not a high-conviction single-cause move.
Provenance▾
EvidenceEvidenceWhat kind of fact this row is. A completed sale, a live ask and a calculated guide price are three different weights of evidence about the same number, and this column is the difference between them.
ObservedObservedThe day the fact was read — not the day the underlying event happened, and not today. An old date is an old reading.
AgeAgeHow long ago this row was read, as of the moment the page was computed.
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight this row carries where it feeds a model, from the resolver that matched it. Lower means a looser match or a thinner source, and a low-confidence row is reweighted rather than dropped.
ModelledModelledYes = a CALCULATED value (a guide price, an estimate); No = something actually observed (a sale, a listing, a census count). A modelled row is evidence about a model, not about the market.
Highest Volume
The 12 most-traded cards by dollar volume over the last 30 days
#
Card
Set
No.
30d volumeDollars traded over the last 30 days — units sold each day times that day’s price, summed. The same figure the wall sorts by, and the order this list is in.
PriceThe card’s current market price as the wall quotes it (an item price, before shipping).
What the market is actually asking right now — the cheapest delivered price, or the newest confirmed print when no ladder exists. The card’s verdict is where this line falls against the band.
$1.22Fair value$1.22The blend’s point estimate — the weighted centre of the four component reads listed below. It is the middle of a band, not a target: read the band’s width before the point.
Sales VWAP$1.22Trend anchor$1.04
$0.00The bottom of the stated fair-value band — the cheap end of the blend, not a floor and not a support level. A wider band is the model saying it is less sure, so the two ends are more informative together than the point between them.$5.10The top of the stated fair-value band — the rich end of the blend, not a ceiling and not a target. A wider band is the model saying it is less sure, so the two ends are more informative together than the point between them.
Sales VWAP$1.22100%Sales VWAP$1.22Time-decayed, unit-weighted mean delivered price of confirmed prints — the last 48h dominate.Weight 100% of the blend, after reweighting away the inputs with no evidence.Depth clearingN/A—Depth clearingN/AUnavailable in the trailing 30d window — reweighted away, not defaulted.No evidence for this input, so it carries no weight — the blend is the other components, reweighted.Trend anchor$1.040%Trend anchor$1.04The rise is confirmed and this anchor (a trailing SMA) sits on the far side of what the card is printing — reweighted away, not blended against the move.Weight 0% of the blend, after reweighting away the inputs with no evidence.Auction clearingN/A—Auction clearingN/AUnavailable in the trailing 30d window — reweighted away, not defaulted.No evidence for this input, so it carries no weight — the blend is the other components, reweighted.
≈$1.18 item basis · ±209.0% band · 2 of 4 inputs · 59 obs / 30dBand is ±319.0% of the point estimate: 1 of 4 components available (excluded: depth clearing, trend anchor — a trailing average on a confirmed rise, auction clearing — 60% of weight reweighted away, 30% confidence penalty), on 59 observation(s) in the trailing 30d. Thin samples and missing components widen the band 2.81x over the raw component spread. No recent clearing price: too few prints in the last 120h to say what it is trading at now.
›67.1% under fair — buy at $1.89 delivered.
Market safety
—No bookNo visible asks, so there is no control cost to band.
Nothing is listed for sale, so there is no book for one buyer to move.
Mechanics▾
VenuesTCGplayer
The absorption ladder walks the visible delivered-price ask book cheapest-first: what each slice of the book costs, the ask it leaves marginal, and how far that sits from the last price the card actually traded at. Manipulation risk is the worse of two reads — how many days of this card’s own turnover it would take to absorb the cost of control, and whether the whole buyable book fits inside a single ordinary order.
Flow
▼CoolingThis week's daily sold units sit entirely below the middle half of the rest of the window — the two interquartile ranges do not overlap. A claim about ACTIVITY, not about price direction.
17 sold in 7d, 0.3× the 30d pace — 30d prints clear at $1.49 median, -21.2% vs the $1.89 floor.
This week 17 · last week 49 · 30d/wk 55
Recent prints
$1.79-5.3%1d ago$1.79 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$6.05+220.1%3d ago$6.05 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$1.99+5.3%3d ago$1.99 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$2.07+9.5%
Method▾
Daily units are the venue's own sold-quantity history, expanded off each bucket's real span, plus confirmed prints from the other side of the market. Prints come from the live sales tape at delivered prices. The floor is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same one FAIR VALUE prices against.
Over 30d: 59 confirmed print(s) (3 with no contemporaneous ask reference, excluded from net flow); net flow +$7.00 across 13 buy-side vs 53 sell-side unit(s); large prints (>= $2.24) were 38% of notional and skewed buy-side -> ACCUMULATING.
Bottom line
▲Buy68/100 on the weighted composite: at or above 65 is a buy, at or below 35 a sell, and everything between is a hold.
68/100 across 8 of 11 inputs. For: the cheapest ask is 67.1% under fair. Against: this one was printed in quantity.
Value vs fair100Value vs fair100/100The cheapest delivered ask against the blended fair-value estimate, two points per percent. Above 50 the card is trading under what the evidence says it is worth. Withheld entirely when fair value declares itself UNKNOWN — a discount measured against an untrustworthy anchor is not a discount.Carries 17% of the composite.Liquidity93Liquidity93/100Four equally-weighted readings of what counterparties did: the chance it trades today, how many of the last 30 days carried a trade, 30-day units sold against the units on the board, and how many different people are selling it. A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight.Carries 9% of the composite.Relative strength94Relative strength94/100This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Carries 7% of the composite.Scarcity8Scarcity8/100How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.Carries 7% of the composite.Price trend68Price trend68/1007-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Carries 13% of the composite.Money flow68Money flow68/100Confirmed prints split into buy-side and sell-side against the prevailing ask, on a log scale — one decade of imbalance earns the full swing, because 100:1 is a thinner sample saying what 10:1 already said.Carries 11% of the composite.Grading upside19Grading upside19/100Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Carries 6% of the composite.Book pressure47Book pressure47/100Supply leaving the market or refilling it. Prefers the 30-day inventory change; falls back to the venue's own listing count over the readings held, capped tighter because a shorter window is weaker evidence. Withheld on a count that never moves, or on a book so small that one listing's arrival pins the percent to a rail.Carries 11% of the composite.
8 of 11 inputs · 81% weight · -9% confidence▾
Not reading yet: manipulation risk, seller concentration, reprint risk.
Value vs fair17%100The cheapest delivered ask against the blended fair-value estimate, two points per percent. Above 50 the card is trading under what the evidence says it is worth. Withheld entirely when fair value declares itself UNKNOWN — a discount measured against an untrustworthy anchor is not a discount.Liquidity9%93Four equally-weighted readings of what counterparties did: the chance it trades today, how many of the last 30 days carried a trade, 30-day units sold against the units on the board, and how many different people are selling it. A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight.Relative strength7%94This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Scarcity7%8How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.
Gem rate
▲Easy gem · choose ACEACE issued a 10 on 67.0% of its 88 slabs of this printing. Next best is PSA at 59.8% on 922 slabs — inside the two readings’ 95% intervals, so the census does not separate them. Easy at 60% or more, moderate from 35%, hard under 35%. Only graders with 30+ slabs on file are compared.
ACE gems 67.0% of 88 slabs; next best PSA at 59.8%.
10 rate by grader
ACE · choose67.0%ACE 1059 of 88ACE: 59 of the 88 ACE slabs on file are a 10 (ACE 10) — 67.0%, 95% interval 56.7%–76.0%.PSA59.8%PSA 10551 of 922PSA: 551 of the 922 PSA slabs on file are a 10 (PSA 10) — 59.8%, 95% interval 56.6%–62.9%.CGC41.9%Gem Mint 10 + Perfect 10 + Pristine 10402 of 959CGC: 402 of the 959 CGC slabs on file are a 10 (Gem Mint 10 + Perfect 10 + Pristine 10) — 41.9%, 95% interval 38.8%–45.1%.
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Slab premium
▲Strong slab premiumThe dearest priced rung is PSA 10 at $49.75, 93.9× the $0.53 raw reference (modelled guide price).
A PSA 10 is worth $49.75 — 93.9× the $0.53 raw modelled guide price.
Dearest slab per grading company
PSA 10$49.7593.9×PSA 10 — $49.75, 93.9× raw$40.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-07 · $47.00 · EBAY · 2026-09-16 · $59.99 · EBAY · 2026-09-14 +17 more print(s)CGC 10$19.2536.3×CGC 10 — $19.25, 36.3× raw$18.50 · EBAY · 2026-09-29 · $20.00 · EBAY · 2026-09-19ACE 10$13.3725.2×ACE 10 — $13.37, 25.2× raw$11.50 · EBAY · 2026-09-04 · $15.23 · EBAY · 2026-08-29BGS 9$10.0018.9×BGS 9 — $10.00, 18.9× raw$10.00 · EBAY · 2026-09-02Raw$0.53guideThe provider’s MODELLED value for this grade — not a sale and not even an offer. Often extrapolated from the grades that did sell.1.0×Raw — $0.53, 1.0× rawThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. Every multiple on this ladder is taken against it.
A PSA 10 fetches 158% more than a CGC 10.
One rung down, a PSA 9 is $14.43 — 27.2× raw.
Grading ROI
▼Don't gradePSA: -$54.69 expected after $84.99 of fees — observed gem share 60% of n=922.
Best on PSA: -$54.69 expected after $84.99 of fees — observed gem share 60% of n=922.
VendorVendorThe grading company, one row each. Rows are the graders we hold both a fee schedule and a population census for — a grader we cannot price is left out rather than estimated.
FeeFeeThe all-in submission cost per card at this grader: grading tier plus shipping both ways and insurance, as published. A † marks a fee we could not read from a published schedule and had to carry from a prior reading. Lower is better.
P(10)P(10)The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
10 price10 priceWhat a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
ROI(10)ROI(10)Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
Risk-wtdRisk-wtdThe same return weighted by the odds of each grade, not just the 10 — the number to compare graders on, because a high P(10) at a high fee can lose to a lower one. A leading ≈ means the full grade distribution was unavailable and a coarser method stood in. Higher is better.
ACE
$24.39ACE Basic — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. £18.00 converted at GBP/USD 1.355 (2026-09-01) — a conversion, not a quoted USD price. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Core $16.26, Value $20.33.
67.0%95% interval 56.7%–76.0% on n=88. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$13.37$13.37. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-77%-$38.32 on a $49.92 cost basis.
≈-84%No ACE price below grade 10 exists at any basis, so a miss is valued at the raw reference price — fee and shipping sunk for a slab the market pays no premium for.
BGS
$79.95BGS Express — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-09-01. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Base $14.95.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
Pre-grade this card →Photograph your own copy front and back for centering, wear and the odds of each grade. An estimate, not a grade.
$0.53 raw (modelled guide price) + $59.99 PSA Standard + $25.00 ship/ins = $85.52 · less 13.25% sale fee · 45d lockup
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Secret Rare
1 in 1,317
Secret Rare — 27 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Secret Rare is 1 in 1,317 packs.
Ultra Rare1 in 785Ultra Rare — 31 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Ultra Rare is 1 in 785 packs.
Holo Rare VMAX~1 in 213Holo Rare VMAX — 2 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Holo Rare VMAX is 1 in 213 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Holo Rare VSTAR~1 in 213Holo Rare VSTAR — 7 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Holo Rare VSTAR is 1 in 213 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Holo Rare V1 in 141Holo Rare V — 18 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Holo Rare V is 1 in 141 packs.
Radiant Rare~1 in 64Radiant Rare — 3 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Radiant Rare is 1 in 64 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Hit tiers in Astral Radiance, hardest at the top. Log scale.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set; the figure shown is 1/p, the mean number of packs to one copy. The ladder plots every tier of the set on a logarithmic scale, because a set spans two orders of magnitude between its commonest hit and its hardest and a linear scale would pin all but one of them to the same end.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Print scarcity
•Heavily printedAgainst every card we can read, this one's implied print run lands in the heavily printed third. It is an ORDER, not a count — the model recovers no print figure and does not try to. Read from Astral Radiance's pooled print scale and this card's own pull rate.
Against every card we can read, this one's implied print run lands in the heavily printed third. It is an ORDER, not a count — the model recovers no print figure and does not try to. Read from Astral Radiance's pooled print scale and this card's own pull rate.
LightModerateHeavy
Model inputs
Graded copies1,975 copiesGraded copies1,975 copiesSlabs on record across PSA, CGC and ACE, summed over every grade. The model’s raw input — it is NOT the print run, because a card people grade often will show a large population off a small press run. Ungraded and sealed copies are invisible to it.Packs per copy1 in 64Packs per copy1 in 64How many packs it takes to see one named copy of this card — the same figure SCARCITY leads with. It is what converts a set-wide print scale into this card’s own.Set read from80 cardsSet read from80 cardsEvery card in the set with a price, a population and a pull rate gives an independent estimate of how many packs of the set exist. They are pooled by median, so one mis-joined card cannot move the answer.
Method▾
Graded population is print run × how often anyone bothers grading it, and the second factor moves with VALUE — so population is divided by price^0.606, the elasticity fitted across 3,826 cards that carry a population, a price and a pull rate at once. That normalised count is turned into a SET pack scale using the card’s pull rate (every card in a set is an independent read on how many packs exist, pooled by median), then brought back down to this card by its own pull rate. The band is a tertile of the result across every card that clears the gates.
Nobody has ever published a Pokémon print run, and this does not recover one — it is an ORDER, not a count. It reads surviving graded supply across PSA, CGC and ACE, so ungraded and sealed stock are invisible to it. What it is checked against: the model puts Black & White at the bottom of the catalog and modern Scarlet & Violet at the top, which is where the smallest and largest print runs actually are.
1 in 21 packsest.
Slot odds1 in 21 packsTCGplayer (Authentication Center), pooled by PokéQuant — no sample size published. Nobody has measured this set; this is the rate the rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Era model: mean of 3 measured studies — 5.01%, 4.55%, 4.55% of packs — from Lost Origin, Silver Tempest and Crown Zenith. No study of this set exists. Community measurement, not official odds: nobody publishes physical pack rates.
Cards at rarity3 in Astral RadianceCards at rarity3 in Astral RadianceCounted from the catalog: 3 printings in Astral Radiance carry the rarity "Radiant Rare".
This card1 in 64 packsest. ±30%This card1 in 64 packsThe era model’s rate for this rarity, split evenly across the 3 cards printed at it. That even split is the estimate's weakest link, and it is bounded rather than hand-waved: a published 8,000-pack study put two Special Illustration Rares from one set at 1 in 309 and 1 in 393 packs — same rarity, same set — so a per-card figure is good to about ±30%.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set. Expected packs is 1/p, the mean of the geometric distribution. The range plots expected pack spend ÷ the single's delivered price on a log axis centred on parity. Pack price is a sealed product's own price divided by its stated pack count, and is computed only where that count carries a source. The single is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same figure FAIR VALUE prices against.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region — the only official drop-rate page covers the digital TCG Live packs and lists no probabilities at all. Every figure here is a hand-entered citation of a published pack-opening study, and each one names its source and sample on hover.
Sealed
—No MSRP on fileThese products are priced, but not one of them carries a recorded MSRP with a source behind it. An MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, and an appreciation measured against nothing is not a judgement this card will invent. The prices are listed below; the comparison is what is missing.
26 of this set’s 31 sealed products carry a price; none carries a recorded MSRP to measure appreciation against.
Set supply · not this card’sThe set's wholesale supply, not this card's — bulk lifts every raw copy in the set.▼Low12 lots listed on 2026-10-15 — higher than 50% of the set's own readings over 31 readings in 90 days.12 lots · CA$15.28 CAD/pack
Method▾
Sealed product from Astral Radiance — the set this card was printed in. We track which set a product belongs to, not which cards are inside it. Appreciation is each product’s last stored price against its own recorded MSRP, in percent. The card’s call is the MEDIAN of those percentages across the products that have an MSRP — a median rather than a mean, so one outlier SKU cannot carry a whole set — and a product with no MSRP on file is left out of that aggregate rather than counted as zero; it still lists below with its price. MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, so it is shown only where a source is recorded against it, and that source is on the row’s hover. The bands are a legend for the percentage the card prints beside them: within ±5% is at MSRP, which is this repo’s own fair-value tolerance; up to +25% is a slight premium; up to +100% a significant one; at or above +100% the price has at least doubled and the figure is stated as a multiple, because a four-digit percentage is not a number anybody reads. Each price line takes a day’s observed low/high sale range and plots its midpoint; on a day with no recorded sale it carries the provider’s own daily guide value instead — a quoted price, not a transaction — and those days are drawn dashed, never described as trades. Every line is indexed to its own first stored day = 100, so the chart compares appreciation between products rather than price levels: a booster pack and a booster box cannot honestly share a dollar axis.
Restock
—Not readReadings exist, but none of them is a positive statement either way. UNKNOWN means we loaded the page and could not tell — never that the shelf was empty.
7 tracked SKUs, and not one of them could be read on the last pass.
Best Buy: not currently tracked.Walmart: not currently tracked.Target: 7 SKUs of Astral Radiance's sealed products tracked.GameStop: not currently tracked.
1 retailer tracked · Target · 3 not monitoredEvery retailer in the registry has a cell, including the ones that are not tracked — a shelf nobody is watching reads UNKNOWN, never 'sold out'. One store's empty shelf is not the whole market, and an untracked one is not evidence about the market at all.Set-level: Astral Radiance sealed products, not this cardRetail rows attach to SEALED products only — no big-box retailer sells single cards — so this whole card is the SET's shelf availability. It is not a statement about this card, and a card's own price is unaffected by it.Newest reading 30d ago · Sep 15, 09:07 UTCAvailability decays faster than any other number on the site, so this read is never cached and every row states its own age. An hour-old 'in stock' is a guess; the age is how you tell.Print status unknownThere is no published source for whether a Pokémon product is still being printed — The Pokémon Company has never announced print cessation in any region, and the annual rotation announcement is about tournament legality, not production. So this is an inference, never a fact, and the verdict above comes from observed shelf readings instead. Nothing direct is on file here — no shelf reading either way and no recorded reprint announcement — and release age plus a price ratio is a hypothesis, not a print status, so no estimate is made.
Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping — never comparable to a delivered price.Retail shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not comparable to the delivered marketplace prices shown elsewhere on this page. They are never fed into a delivered-price floor.Method▾
Each row is one tracked retailer's most recent reading of one of the set's sealed products, at that retailer's own SKU. A restock is an observed OUT_OF_STOCK → IN_STOCK transition in that SKU's reading history, never a change we inferred from a price or a gap. Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not delivered prices and are never fed into a floor.
Absorption
—Building historyToo few readings of the book to tell a drawdown from noise. The count is on the card — see the note below.
20 readings of this book so far, one per 1 day, over 25d. The direction reads once there are enough of them to tell a drawdown from noise.
Method▾
Each reading takes the venue's own listing count for this card in this condition — the whole book — at that instant. The direction is classified by the platform's absorption reading over that series: a book drawn down with demand behind it reads as accumulation, one that refills after a drawdown reads as distribution. Copies and sellers come from the cheapest asks we sample, not from the book, and are labelled as such. Sold units are confirmed prints from the live tape over the same span, and are shown only when the tape reaches back past the first reading.
The direction is classified over the platform-standard 30-day trailing window. That window is a scope, not a history: it contains exactly the readings counted on this card and no others — and only readings that counted the venue’s own book, never a sampled one trended against a counted one.
Meta vs price
Not enough history (0 weeks)
Spearman rank correlation of weekly share against weekly median price over the trailing 26 weeks, on the weeks carrying both. Printed only at 8 weeks or more; below that the count is stated instead of a coefficient off a handful of readings.
Mark F left Standard on April 11, 2025.
94.5% of card lines in these decklists matched a card in our catalog; an unmatched line is never counted. Online events only, not Regionals or Worlds. Tournament results →
EvidenceEvidenceThe specific observations the explanation rests on. If this row is thin, treat the explanation as thin — it is the only thing holding it up.
Evidence: item-basis daily bars, TCGplayer active listings, absorption read ("Over 30d: inventory +2.2%, cheap depth no data, sales velocity no data -> NEUTRAL.").
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight to put on the primary explanation, given how much of the evidence actually resolved. It qualifies the row above; it never adds to it.
Confidence: 40% (floor-confidence 60/100), based on 980 days of observations.
What would disprove itWhat would disprove itThe observation that would break the primary explanation. It is what makes the reading falsifiable rather than unfalsifiable — and it is the thing to watch for next.
This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.
CatalogCard identity: set, number, rarity, finish, release date. It dates from the printing itself, so an old reading here is expected and is not staleness.
May 27, 2022
4.4y
98%
No
Live askA copy offered for sale right now. An ask is what a seller wants, not what anyone paid — it bounds the price from above until it clears.
Oct 15, 2026
8m
90%
No
Guide priceA calculated market guide — a model of where the product is trading. Never a confirmed sale, and always marked Modelled.
Oct 14, 2026
2d
90%
Yes
Price statisticAn observed figure computed over several rows rather than one print — a delivered floor, a published median over a window.
Oct 10, 2026
5d
90%
No
Confirmed saleA completed transaction at a known price — the strongest evidence on this page. Prices are delivered (item + required shipping).
Oct 10, 2026
5d
85%
No
Inventory countHow many copies and listings stand on the book. What depth, supply and absorption are measured against.
Oct 10, 2026
5d
70%
No
Population censusA grader's published count of the copies it has slabbed at each grade. A record of what was submitted and kept, never the odds a copy grades.
Oct 10, 2026
5d
60%
No
Raw · Holo · Near MintWhat every row above was gathered for — one printing, in this one finish and condition or grade. Change either switcher in the header and you are reading a different one; the page's own URL is the address of exactly this one.pq-quant-2026.10.0The version of the scoring and analytics formulas that produced everything on this page. Two figures computed under different versions are not comparable, which is why the version is stated rather than assumed.
3d ago
$2.07 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
$1.25-33.9%3d ago$1.25 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
$1.40-25.9%4d ago$1.40 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
Price trend13%687-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.
Money flow11%68Confirmed prints split into buy-side and sell-side against the prevailing ask, on a log scale — one decade of imbalance earns the full swing, because 100:1 is a thinner sample saying what 10:1 already said.
Grading upside6%19Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.
Book pressure11%47Supply leaving the market or refilling it. Prefers the 30-day inventory change; falls back to the venue's own listing count over the readings held, capped tighter because a shorter window is weaker evidence. Withheld on a count that never moves, or on a book so small that one listing's arrival pins the percent to a rail.
Manipulation risk9%no readingNo visible ask book, so there is no control cost to band.
Seller concentration5%no readingThe venue attributes no seller identity to these asks.
Reprint risk5%no readingPrint status is unestablished — no shelf observation and no recorded reprint event.
The bottom line is a weighted mean of the signals that reported, renormalised so their weights sum to 1. Nothing defaults to a neutral 50: an input with no evidence is reweighted away and its absence is charged as a confidence penalty. Risk rows (manipulation, concentration, reprint) enter inverted. Data quality carries no weight at all — it decides whether the verdict may be spoken, because knowing a lot about a card is not a reason to buy it. Competitive meta sits OUTSIDE the weighted mean as a capped bonus added after it: a card nobody plays is never marked down for that, and a card the meta is built on can be marked up for it.
—No 10 price is on file for BGS, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no BGS population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
CGC
$20.00CGC Economy — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Bulk $17.00.
41.9%95% interval 38.8%–45.1% on n=959. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$19.25$19.25. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-63%-$28.83 on a $45.53 cost basis.
≈-72%Only 8% of the CGC distribution is priced, so this falls back to P(10)·ROI(10) + (1−P(10))·ROI(pooled sub-10 price).
PSA
$59.99PSA Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Value Bulk $24.99, Value $32.99.
59.8%95% interval 56.6%–62.9% on n=922. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$49.75$49.75. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-50%-$42.36 on a $85.52 cost basis.
-64%Risk-weighted across all 9 PSA rungs; 98% of the distribution carried its own price, the remaining 2% valued at the pooled sub-10 price.
SGC
$79.00†No published SGC fee verified — this is the generic fallback, not SGC's price.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for SGC, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no SGC population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator. Fee is the generic $79.00 fallback — SGC's own published price is not in the fee table.
TAG
$59.95TAG Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Basic $22.00.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for TAG, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no TAG population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
The Astral Radiance Booster Pack's most recent plotted day carries an observed sale.
Indexed to each product’s own first stored day = 100. Astral Radiance Booster Pack in front, 25 behind · dashed = guide price, no sale that day.Each line is that product’s own price divided by its own first stored day and multiplied by 100, so every series starts on the dotted rule and the axis measures APPRECIATION rather than price. Dollars could not do this job here: a booster pack and a booster box differ by two orders of magnitude, and on a shared dollar axis the pack would sit flat on the floor of the plot however far it had actually travelled. The Astral Radiance Booster Pack is the base unit and is drawn in front; the rest are drawn behind it, and each one’s own numbers are in the table below. A dashed stretch is a run of days with no recorded sale, carrying the provider’s daily guide value — a quoted price, never a trade.
Appreciation vs MSRP
ProductPriceMSRPvs MSRPEvery sealed product the catalog holds for this set, ordered by how standard a unit each is for tracking a set’s sealed price. PRICE is the product’s last stored day — a sale where one was recorded, the provider’s daily guide value where none was, and the row’s hover says which. MSRP is blank wherever no source is recorded against one, because an MSRP with nobody behind it is not a fact. VS MSRP is the price against that MSRP, as a percentage up to a doubling and as a multiple past it.
Astral Radiance Booster Pack$10.64——Astral Radiance Booster Pack—Astral Radiance Booster Pack. Last sale $10.64 on Oct 14, 2026. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Sleeved Booster Pack$13.10——Astral Radiance Sleeved Booster Pack—Astral Radiance Sleeved Booster Pack. Quoted at $13.10 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Oricorio]$14.09——Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Oricorio]—Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Oricorio]. Quoted at $14.09 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Toxel]$15.33——Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Toxel]—Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Toxel]. Quoted at $15.33 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Feraligatr]$23.79——Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Feraligatr]—Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Feraligatr]. Quoted at $23.79 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Steelix]$26.02——Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Steelix]—Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Steelix]. Quoted at $26.02 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Set of 2]$30.47——Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Set of 2]—Astral Radiance Single Pack Blister [Set of 2]. Quoted at $30.47 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Swampert]$31.29——Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Swampert]—Astral Radiance Premium Checklane Blister [Swampert]. Quoted at $31.29 on Oct 14, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.
Astral Radiance Booster Pack at Target, SKU 1012176481 — Not read, no shelf price shown. Read Sep 15, 08:46 UTC. A Astral Radiance sealed product, not this card.
Not readAstral Radiance Booster Pack30d agoAstral Radiance Booster Pack at Target, SKU 1012176787 — Not read, no shelf price shown. Read Sep 15, 08:46 UTC. A Astral Radiance sealed product, not this card.
Not readAstral Radiance Booster Pack30d agoAstral Radiance Booster Pack at Target, SKU 1012177229 — Not read, no shelf price shown. Read Sep 15, 08:46 UTC. A Astral Radiance sealed product, not this card.
Not readAstral Radiance Build & Battle Box30d agoAstral Radiance Build & Battle Box at Target, SKU 92955640 — Not read, no shelf price shown. Read Sep 15, 09:07 UTC. A Astral Radiance sealed product, not this card.