10,074 have been certified at this exact grade by PSA, as of October 15, 2026.
What is the premium for a PSA 10 Litten over raw?
A PSA 10 Litten trades at about 6.1x the raw sold median, $36.50 against $6.03 raw, as of October 15, 2026.
How does PSA 10 compare to the next grade?
A PSA 10 Litten trades 104% more than a PSA 9, the grade below it, as of October 15, 2026.
Litten — 044
Litten — 044PSA 10 · HoloEvery price, print, listing and score on this page belongs to this one printing in this one condition or grade — switch either dropdown and you are looking at a different one.
The condition or grade being priced. Each one is a separate instrument that trades at its own price, so choosing one replaces every figure on the page. “All conditions” and “All grades” are a union of the siblings — their tape, listings and volume are combined, with one sibling named as the reference for price and analytics.
1D+0.2%1D return+0.2%Change in the headline market price against the close 1 observed bar back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.7D+1.4%7D return+1.4%Change in the headline market price against the close 7 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.30D-27.0%30D return-27.0%Change in the headline market price against the close 30 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.As of 20:59ZAs of 20:59ZThe market price, its 1D/7D/30D returns, the order book, the For Sale counts and today’s price bar as they stood when this page was built. The page itself is served from a shared cache, so this stamp — not the moment you loaded it — is how old these numbers are. Your browser re-reads them a moment after the page arrives and this line follows.
Mkt Price
$36.50item▲+0.2%
Last $44.99 · 2d
Mkt Price$36.50 itemThe marketplace’s own published guide price for the day. The day’s own prints were too few to take a median from — two trades at one seller’s price point is not a market — so the guide is quoted instead (D-397). The chart still draws every print the day had. Last confirmed fixed-price sale: $44.99 at 2026-10-13T07:00:00.000Z. Shipping was not stated, so it has no delivered price. One trade, not a statistic — the figure above it is the day's median.
Fair ValueN/A
Fair ValueN/ANo fair value is published for this instrument: no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book. The components below show what evidence exists; the estimate they would blend to is withheld rather than quoted. A weighted blend of independent estimates, quoted DELIVERED — item plus required shipping — where Mkt Price beside it may be item basis. Read the band, not the point: its width is the model's own confidence.
LiquidityN/A
LiquidityN/AHow easily a position clears, scored 0–100. Four readings, equally weighted, each independently nullable: trade rate (the chance it trades today, from 30d units sold), trade breadth (how many of the last 30 days carried a trade), queue clearance (30d units sold against the units on the board) and seller dispersion (how many different people are selling it). A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight — never filled in with a zero.
30D Vol
457units
units · vs prior 30d
30D Vol457 units457 units over the last 30 days, on TCGplayer and eBay. Newest reading Oct 14, 2026. No earlier 30-day window to compare against.
For Sale
0units
live delivered asks
For Sale0 unitsEvery active fixed-price ask with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and are never counted here.
Graded Pop
24,873▲+44.7%
across 3 graders
Graded Pop24,873Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds a copy grades 10.
How this summary is madeThe first sentence is written by a language model from this card’s own data. The second is computed from the live numbers on this page every time it loads, so it moves with the market.
One candle per UTC day — the finest grain this market recordsOne candle per ISO week (Mon–Sun), rolled up from the daily barsOne candle per calendar month, rolled up from the daily barsitem — the sale price alone, excluding shipping. This is the basis TCGplayer’s own market guide is published on, and the basis every wall tile, screener row and watchlist quote uses, so it is what the headline compares against.delivered — item + required shipping, the basis every alarm, floor and fair value uses. A print whose shipping the venue never stated has no delivered price and is excluded from the bar rather than counted at its item price; a day with no priced print falls back to the guide, which is an item price and says so.
How each period is drawn. Candles and bars show the full observed open/high/low/close; line and area show the close alone. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
as of Oct 13, 2026 · UTC
history since Aug 2026
Litten — 044 · 1DMed$42.49▲+16.7%2 prints · medianitem priceLast $44.99 · Oct 13
Vol 10 sold·5 tcgp·5 ebay·2 prints·2 obs
—
RSI 14
Live Listings
Pricevs MktQtyCond
TCGplayer0
eBay0
Fair value
—
Insufficient data
No fair value is published for this card — no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book.
Market safety
—No bookNo visible asks, so there is no control cost to band.
Nothing is listed for sale, so there is no book for one buyer to move.
Flow
Steady
Supply
▲Nothing listedNo active fixed-price ask carries a known delivered price right now. Anyone who wants one has to bid for it or wait.
0 units listed — 0.0d of stock at the 30-day pace of 15.2/day.
PopulationAll graders pooled24,873Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, as each of them states its own total. A share of what was submitted and kept — never the odds a copy grades 10. The bars below sum to 24,874, not 24,873: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.ACE2,081Slabs ACE itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.CGC10,608Slabs CGC itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.PSA12,184Slabs PSA itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve. The bars below sum to 12,185, not 12,184: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.
1010 — 21,256 slabs, 85.5% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 1,909 · CGC 9,273 (Gem Mint 10 · Pristine 10) · PSA 10,0749.5 — 307 slabs, 1.2% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 30799 — 2,947 slabs, 11.8% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 143 · CGC 831 · PSA 1,9738.5 — 104 slabs, 0.4% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 103 · PSA 188 — 171 slabs, 0.7% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 20 · CGC 56 · PSA 957.5 — 14 slabs, 0.1% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 1477 — 25 slabs, 0.1% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 4 · PSA 176.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 166 — 18 slabs, 0.1% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 1 · CGC 1 · PSA 1655 — 8 slabs, 0.0% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 1 · PSA 74.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 24,874 charted hereCGC 144 — 2 slabs, 0.0% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 1 · PSA 111 — 2 slabs, 0.0% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 1 · PSA 1AAuth — 18 slabs, 0.1% of the 24,874 charted hereACE 2 (Authentic · qualified) · CGC 16
Listed0 unitsActive fixed-price asks with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and never enter this count.Sold · 30d · 15.2/day457 unitsUnits over the last 30 days, on TCGplayer and eBay. Newest reading 2026-10-14.Graded · ACE 2,081 · CGC 10,608 · PSA 12,18424,873 slabsEvery slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Print scarcity
•Set not coveredA set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. this set does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
A set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. this set does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
LightModerateHeavy
Model inputs
Graded copies24,874 copies
Competitive play•Fringe0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days, measured play below the 5% regular threshold.
0.0%+0.0 ppChange in share against the 30-day window ending September 13, 2026, in percentage points.In 4 of 22,383 Standard decklists across 338 events, last 30 days · 3.0 copies per deck that plays it.
Copies3.0Mean copies per deck that runs it, over the 4 decks that do; never averaged against the decks that do not. The bar is scaled to 4, the per-deck limit.
Why It's Moving
What changedWhat changedThe observable that moved, stated before any reason for it — the fact the rest of this panel has to account for.
Sold median moved +1.4% over the trailing 7 days and -27.0% over 30 days, last printing at $36.50. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanationPrimary explanationThe reading the evidence best supports. It is an explanation, never a forecast, and it is only as good as the Evidence row two lines down.
Primary read: no single factor dominates; the composite score is being driven by broad, low-amplitude movement across most inputs.
AlternativeAlternativeA competing explanation the SAME evidence would also support. It is printed even when the primary looks strong: an explanation with no stated alternative is a story, not an analysis.
Alternative explanation: with only 0 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, the move could just as easily be sampling noise rather than a durable shift.
Evidence
Provenance▾
EvidenceEvidenceWhat kind of fact this row is. A completed sale, a live ask and a calculated guide price are three different weights of evidence about the same number, and this column is the difference between them.
ObservedObservedThe day the fact was read — not the day the underlying event happened, and not today. An old date is an old reading.
AgeAgeHow long ago this row was read, as of the moment the page was computed.
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight this row carries where it feeds a model, from the resolver that matched it. Lower means a looser match or a thinner source, and a low-confidence row is reweighted rather than dropped.
ModelledModelledYes = a CALCULATED value (a guide price, an estimate); No = something actually observed (a sale, a listing, a census count). A modelled row is evidence about a model, not about the market.
Highest Volume
The 12 most-traded cards by dollar volume over the last 30 days
#
Card
Set
No.
30d volumeDollars traded over the last 30 days — units sold each day times that day’s price, summed. The same figure the wall sorts by, and the order this list is in.
PriceThe card’s current market price as the wall quotes it (an item price, before shipping).
This week's daily sold units overlap the middle half of the rest of the window, so no change in pace is separable from the noise. Trading at its own normal rate.
64 sold in 7d, 0.6× the 30d pace — 30d prints clear at $35.00 median.
This week 64 · last week 116 · 30d/wk 107
Recent prints
$46.001d ago$46.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z$41.001d ago$41.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z$33.001d ago$33.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z$33.001d ago$33.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z$32.501d ago$32.50 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z$32.501d ago$32.50 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-14T07:00:00.000Z
Method▾
Daily units are the venue's own sold-quantity history, expanded off each bucket's real span, plus confirmed prints from the other side of the market. Prints come from the live sales tape at delivered prices. The floor is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same one FAIR VALUE prices against.
Bottom line
—No callUnder half the model had evidence, so the score is a statement about the inputs that reported rather than about the card. No call until more of them do.
50/100 across 1 of 11 inputs. Every input that reported landed near neutral. That is under half the model, so no call is made on it.
Grading upside48Grading upside48/100Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Carries 6% of the composite.
1 of 11 inputs · 6% weight · -35% confidence▾
Not reading yet: value vs fair, price trend, money flow, book pressure, liquidity, relative strength, manipulation risk, seller concentration, reprint risk, scarcity.
Grading upside6%48Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Value vs fair17%no readingFair value returned UNKNOWN — too few comparable prints to anchor an estimate.Price trend13%no readingNo price history in the 7- and 30-day windows, or no confirmed print in 30 days — the line is the relay’s guide.Money flow11%no readingNo confirmed prints with a contemporaneous ask to classify against.Book pressure11%no readingNeeds a 30-day inventory change, or book counts spanning ≥3 days that move at all and rest on ≥8 listings. Collection of `inventory_observations` began 2026-09-02.
Competitive meta+2A BONUS on top of the weighted composite, never a penalty: 20% of Standard decklists or more adds 8, 5% or more adds 5, and any measured play at all adds 2. A card nobody plays is not marked down for it. Measured on 0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days.
The bottom line is a weighted mean of the signals that reported, renormalised so their weights sum to 1. Nothing defaults to a neutral 50: an input with no evidence is reweighted away and its absence is charged as a confidence penalty. Risk rows (manipulation, concentration, reprint) enter inverted. Data quality carries no weight at all — it decides whether the verdict may be spoken, because knowing a lot about a card is not a reason to buy it. Competitive meta sits OUTSIDE the weighted mean as a capped bonus added after it: a card nobody plays is never marked down for that, and a card the meta is built on can be marked up for it.
Gem rate
▲Easy gem · choose ACEACE issued a 10 on 91.7% of its 2,081 slabs of this printing. Next best is CGC at 87.4% on 10,608 slabs. Easy at 60% or more, moderate from 35%, hard under 35%. Only graders with 30+ slabs on file are compared.
ACE gems 91.7% of 2,081 slabs; next best CGC at 87.4%.
10 rate by grader
ACE · choose91.7%ACE 101,909 of 2,081ACE: 1,909 of the 2,081 ACE slabs on file are a 10 (ACE 10) — 91.7%, 95% interval 90.5%–92.8%.CGC87.4%Gem Mint 10 + Pristine 109,273 of 10,608CGC: 9,273 of the 10,608 CGC slabs on file are a 10 (Gem Mint 10 + Pristine 10) — 87.4%, 95% interval 86.8%–88.0%.PSA82.7%PSA 1010,074 of 12,184PSA: 10,074 of the 12,184 PSA slabs on file are a 10 (PSA 10) — 82.7%, 95% interval 82.0%–83.3%.
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Slab premium
▲Strong slab premiumThe dearest priced rung is BGS Black Label 10 at $1,150.00, 190.7× the $6.03 raw reference (sold median).
A BGS Black Label 10 is worth $1,150.00 — 190.7× the $6.03 raw sold median.
Dearest slab per grading company
BGS Black Label 10$1,150.00191×BGS Black Label 10 — $1,150.00, 190.7× raw$1,175.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-05 · $1,125.00 · EBAY · 2026-09-03CGC Pristine 10$47.497.9×CGC Pristine 10 — $47.49, 7.9× raw$33.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-09 · $49.99 · EBAY · 2026-10-09 · $37.99 · EBAY · 2026-10-08 +28 more print(s)TAG 10$44.997.5×TAG 10 — $44.99, 7.5× raw$42.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-12 · $39.99 · EBAY · 2026-09-27 · $35.33 · EBAY · 2026-09-13 +10 more print(s)PSA 10$37.696.3×PSA 10 — $37.69, 6.3× raw$46.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-14 · $41.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-14 · $33.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-14 +639 more print(s)ACE 10$33.935.6×ACE 10 — $33.93, 5.6× raw$36.02 · EBAY · 2026-09-22 · $41.86 · EBAY · 2026-08-02 · $35.39 · EBAY · 2026-07-31 +3 more print(s)Raw$6.031.0×Raw — $6.03, 1.0× rawThe median price of the day’s confirmed prints — copies that actually changed hands. Every multiple on this ladder is taken against it.
A BGS 10 fetches 2322% more than a CGC 10.
One rung down, a BGS 10 is $80.00 — 13.3× raw.
Grading ROI
▼Don't gradeCGC: -$27.07 expected after $45.00 of fees — observed gem share 87% of n=10608.
Best on CGC: -$27.07 expected after $45.00 of fees — observed gem share 87% of n=10608.
VendorVendorThe grading company, one row each. Rows are the graders we hold both a fee schedule and a population census for — a grader we cannot price is left out rather than estimated.
FeeFeeThe all-in submission cost per card at this grader: grading tier plus shipping both ways and insurance, as published. A † marks a fee we could not read from a published schedule and had to carry from a prior reading. Lower is better.
P(10)P(10)The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
10 price10 priceWhat a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
ROI(10)ROI(10)Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
Risk-wtdRisk-wtdThe same return weighted by the odds of each grade, not just the 10 — the number to compare graders on, because a high P(10) at a high fee can lose to a lower one. A leading ≈ means the full grade distribution was unavailable and a coarser method stood in. Higher is better.
ACE
$24.39ACE Basic — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. £18.00 converted at GBP/USD 1.355 (2026-09-01) — a conversion, not a quoted USD price. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Core $16.26, Value $20.33.
91.7%95% interval 90.5%–92.8% on n=2081. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$33.93$33.93. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-47%-$25.99 on a $55.42 cost basis.
-50%Risk-weighted across all 9 ACE rungs; 100% of the distribution carried its own price, the remaining 0% valued at the pooled sub-10 price.
BGS
$79.95BGS Express — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-09-01. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Base $14.95.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
Pre-grade this card →Photograph your own copy front and back for centering, wear and the odds of each grade. An estimate, not a grade.
$6.03 raw (sold median) + $20.00 CGC Economy + $25.00 ship/ins = $51.03 · less 13.25% sale fee · 45d lockup
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Graded copies
24,874 copies
Slabs on record across PSA, CGC and ACE, summed over every grade. The model’s raw input — it is NOT the print run, because a card people grade often will show a large population off a small press run. Ungraded and sealed copies are invisible to it.
Method▾
Graded population is print run × how often anyone bothers grading it, and the second factor moves with VALUE — so population is divided by price^0.606, the elasticity fitted across 3,826 cards that carry a population, a price and a pull rate at once. That normalised count is turned into a SET pack scale using the card’s pull rate (every card in a set is an independent read on how many packs exist, pooled by median), then brought back down to this card by its own pull rate. The band is a tertile of the result across every card that clears the gates.
Nobody has ever published a Pokémon print run, and this does not recover one — it is an ORDER, not a count. It reads surviving graded supply across PSA, CGC and ACE, so ungraded and sealed stock are invisible to it. What it is checked against: the model puts Black & White at the bottom of the catalog and modern Scarlet & Violet at the top, which is where the smallest and largest print runs actually are.
Top-cut lift1.53×0.0% of 3,647 top-cut decklists run it, against 0.0% of the whole field. Above 1.00 it is over-represented where the money is. Withheld under 20 top-cut decklists.
Deck spread0.001 minus the concentration of this card across the deck archetypes that run it. 1.00 is spread evenly over many decks; 0 is one deck. At or above 0.5 concentration this is a ONE-DECK CARD: its demand rises and falls with a single archetype.
Player floor$0.20The cheapest currently-priced Standard-legal print of this card: Litten, Temporal Forces. What it costs to put the card in a deck, which is not the same question as what THIS print is worth.Premium over floor183×This printing's headline price ($36.50) against the player floor ($0.20). What a player pays for THIS art rather than for the cheapest legal copy of the same card.Playset$0.603.0 copies (the mean per deck that runs it) at the player floor of $0.20. What the decks on file actually bought.Rotation runwayNo rotation scheduled for mark JNo announcement naming mark J has been published. Standard rotation dates are curated by hand from official announcements; a mark with no announced date carries none rather than a guess.30d sold448 units (+4% vs prior 30d)Units of THIS printing sold in the 30 days ending October 13, 2026, against the 30 days before that (430). Demand at a table and demand in the market are different measurements; this is the second one.Meta vs priceρ +0.68 (9 weeks)Spearman rank correlation of weekly share against weekly median price over the trailing 26 weeks, on the weeks carrying both. Printed only at 8 weeks or more; below that the count is stated instead of a coefficient off a handful of readings.
Meta share · % of Standard decklists (right axis)Median price · this print, $ (left axis)Units sold per day (bars)
Does the meta move the price? Share of Standard decklists running this card against this print's median sale price and units sold, day by day; the rank correlation above is printed once 8 weeks exist.
Fringe at 0.0% of Standard decklists, +0.0 pp on the prior window. A playset costs $0.60 at the cheapest legal print.
94.5% of card lines in these decklists matched a card in our catalog; an unmatched line is never counted. Online events only, not Regionals or Worlds. Tournament results →
EvidenceThe specific observations the explanation rests on. If this row is thin, treat the explanation as thin — it is the only thing holding it up.
Evidence: item-basis daily bars, TCGplayer active listings, absorption read ("Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).").
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight to put on the primary explanation, given how much of the evidence actually resolved. It qualifies the row above; it never adds to it.
Confidence: 0%, based on 48 days of observations.
What would disprove itWhat would disprove itThe observation that would break the primary explanation. It is what makes the reading falsifiable rather than unfalsifiable — and it is the thing to watch for next.
This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.
CatalogCard identity: set, number, rarity, finish, release date. It dates from the printing itself, so an old reading here is expected and is not staleness.
Sep 26, 2025
1.1y
98%
No
Population censusA grader's published count of the copies it has slabbed at each grade. A record of what was submitted and kept, never the odds a copy grades.
Oct 15, 2026
1h
60%
No
Price statisticAn observed figure computed over several rows rather than one print — a delivered floor, a published median over a window.
Oct 15, 2026
1h
55%
No
Confirmed saleA completed transaction at a known price — the strongest evidence on this page. Prices are delivered (item + required shipping).
Oct 14, 2026
2d
50%
No
Guide priceA calculated market guide — a model of where the product is trading. Never a confirmed sale, and always marked Modelled.
Oct 15, 2026
1h
30%
Yes
PSA 10 · HoloWhat every row above was gathered for — one printing, in this one finish and condition or grade. Change either switcher in the header and you are reading a different one; the page's own URL is the address of exactly this one.pq-quant-2026.10.0The version of the scoring and analytics formulas that produced everything on this page. Two figures computed under different versions are not comparable, which is why the version is stated rather than assumed.
Liquidity9%no readingFewer than two of the four participation readings could be measured — no trade count, and no book to read a queue or a seller base off.
Manipulation risk9%no readingNo visible ask book, so there is no control cost to band.
Relative strength7%no readingThe wall projection has ranked fewer than 20 cards on 30-day return, so a percentile here would be a rank of a handful dressed up as a market.
Scarcity7%no readingNeither scarcity read is available: no pull rate on file for this card’s rarity, and no print-scale estimate for its set (or the set is inside its first 12 months, where graded population has not accumulated yet).
Seller concentration5%no readingThe venue attributes no seller identity to these asks.
Reprint risk5%no readingPrint status is unestablished — no shelf observation and no recorded reprint event.
$615$615.00. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
+381%+$422.53 on a $110.98 cost basis.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no BGS population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
CGC
$20.00CGC Economy — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Bulk $17.00.
87.4%95% interval 86.8%–88.0% on n=10608. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$35.45$35.45. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-40%-$20.28 on a $51.03 cost basis.
≈-44%Only 55% of the CGC distribution is priced, so this falls back to P(10)·ROI(10) + (1−P(10))·ROI(pooled sub-10 price).
PSA
$59.99PSA Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Value Bulk $24.99, Value $32.99.
82.7%95% interval 82.0%–83.3% on n=12184. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$37.69$37.69. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-64%-$58.32 on a $91.02 cost basis.
-67%Risk-weighted across all 9 PSA rungs; 100% of the distribution carried its own price, the remaining 0% valued at the pooled sub-10 price.
TAG
$59.95TAG Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Basic $22.00.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
$44.99$44.99. What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
-57%-$51.95 on a $90.98 cost basis.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no TAG population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.