Reshiram — 114/113Raw · Normal · Near MintEvery price, print, listing and score on this page belongs to this one printing in this one condition or grade — switch either dropdown and you are looking at a different one.
A different printing of this card — a reverse holo, a promo stamp, another language. Choosing one NAVIGATES: every price, print, listing and score on the page belongs to that printing instead, because they are separate instruments that trade at different prices.The condition or grade being priced. Each one is a separate instrument that trades at its own price, so choosing one replaces every figure on the page. “All conditions” and “All grades” are a union of the siblings — their tape, listings and volume are combined, with one sibling named as the reference for price and analytics.
∅Illiquid / UnknownIlliquid / UnknownThe classifier refused to call one: too little liquidity or too small a sample to test any rule. The absence of a read, never a tenth regime.As of 22:59ZAs of 22:59ZThe market price, its 1D/7D/30D returns, the order book, the For Sale counts and today’s price bar as they stood when this page was built. The page itself is served from a shared cache, so this stamp — not the moment you loaded it — is how old these numbers are. Your browser re-reads them a moment after the page arrives and this line follows.
Mkt Price
$347.37item—
modelled guide
Mkt Price$347.37 itemThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. It is quoted on the ITEM basis — the basis every wall tile is quoted on — and it is what the chart plots on a day with no print of its own.
Fair ValueN/A
Fair ValueN/ANo fair value is published for this instrument: no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book. The components below show what evidence exists; the estimate they would blend to is withheld rather than quoted. A weighted blend of independent estimates, quoted DELIVERED — item plus required shipping — where Mkt Price beside it may be item basis. Read the band, not the point: its width is the model's own confidence.
LiquidityN/A
LiquidityN/AHow easily a position clears, scored 0–100. Four readings, equally weighted, each independently nullable: trade rate (the chance it trades today, from 30d units sold), trade breadth (how many of the last 30 days carried a trade), queue clearance (30d units sold against the units on the board) and seller dispersion (how many different people are selling it). A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight — never filled in with a zero.
30D Vol
6units·0.0%
units · vs prior 30d
30D Vol6 units6 units over the last 30 days, on eBay. Newest reading Sep 29, 2026. Against 6 in the 30 days before.
For Sale
1units
1 sellers
For Sale1 unitsEvery active fixed-price ask with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and are never counted here.
Graded Pop
2,070▲+0.2%
across 3 graders
Graded Pop2,070Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds a copy grades 10.
No live auction bids — this market has no resting bid book.
Cross-Market BasisAsks are live fixed-price listings at delivered prices (item + required shipping). No bid side exists: this market has no resting bid book. There are no live auction bids and no published buylist for this instrument, so the bid side is empty rather than synthesized from asks, price history or a spread assumption.——
AskSize
Ask sideLive fixed-price listings, priced DELIVERED — item plus required shipping. Cheapest first; a listing whose shipping is unknown has no delivered price and is excluded rather than guessed at.
$206.061
$206.06 · 1 unit1 cum.Ask size at this price, and the running total through it from the cheapest ask — 1 unit are buyable at or under $206.06 delivered. The shaded staircase behind the row IS that running total.
Ask depth$206.06Ask depth$206.06Every live fixed-price ask summed at its DELIVERED price — what clearing the whole visible book would cost. There is no bid side to set it against: no auction has a bid on it and no buylist quotes this instrument, and an absent side is never drawn as a zero.
One candle per UTC day — the finest grain this market recordsOne candle per ISO week (Mon–Sun), rolled up from the daily barsOne candle per calendar month, rolled up from the daily barsitem — the sale price alone, excluding shipping. This is the basis TCGplayer’s own market guide is published on, and the basis every wall tile, screener row and watchlist quote uses, so it is what the headline compares against.delivered — item + required shipping, the basis every alarm, floor and fair value uses. A print whose shipping the venue never stated has no delivered price and is excluded from the bar rather than counted at its item price; a day with no priced print falls back to the guide, which is an item price and says so.
How each period is drawn. Candles and bars show the full observed open/high/low/close; line and area show the close alone. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
No fair value is published for this card — no confirmed print or completed auction in 30 days — an estimate built from live asks alone would be a restatement of the book.
Market safety
▲High riskOne buyer can set this price on at least one dimension: a spike here would outlive the 30-day window every number we publish is measured over, or the whole buyable book is inside a single ordinary order (under 5 units).
$206.06 buys the entire visible book — 1 unit, fewer than one ordinary order (30d traded unknown, 1 ask).
Book
Chase
—Pack count unknownA priced sealed product exists, but nothing on record says how many packs are inside it. Defaulting a booster box to 36 packs is true for most modern sets and false for enough of them that the guess would sit invisibly inside a dollar figure, so the card withholds instead.
1 in 72 packs for secret rare, shared by 2 cards in Legendary Treasures — but nothing on record says how many packs are in this set's sealed products, and a guessed pack count would sit invisibly inside the spend figure.
Breakdown
RaritySecret RareRaritySecret RareThe provider's own spelling, verbatim. The odds row and this printing have to carry the same string or no estimate is made — a mismatch must produce nothing rather than another rarity's rate.Slot odds
Supply
▲Tight supply1 listed units against a 0.2/day pace is 5.0 days of stock. Under 7d reads tight, 30d or more reads heavy.
1 units listed across 1 sellers — 5.0d of stock at the 30-day pace of 0.2/day.
PopulationAll graders pooled2,070Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, as each of them states its own total. A share of what was submitted and kept — never the odds a copy grades 10.ACE34Slabs ACE itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.CGC220Slabs CGC itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.PSA1,816Slabs PSA itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.
1010 — 47 slabs, 2.3% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 1 · PSA 4699 — 388 slabs, 18.7% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 2 · CGC 11 · PSA 3758.58.5 — 66 slabs, 3.2% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 6688 — 540 slabs, 26.1% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 12 · CGC 44 · PSA 4847.57.5 — 25 slabs, 1.2% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 2577 — 399 slabs, 19.3% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 5 · CGC 18 · PSA 3766.56.5 — 14 slabs, 0.7% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 1466 — 281 slabs, 13.6% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 12 · PSA 2655.55.5 — 11 slabs, 0.5% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 1155 — 135 slabs, 6.5% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 3 · CGC 3 · PSA 1294.54.5 — 6 slabs, 0.3% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 644 — 51 slabs, 2.5% of the 2,070 charted herePSA 513.53.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 133 — 31 slabs, 1.5% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 3 · PSA 282.52.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 122 — 19 slabs, 0.9% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 1 · PSA 181.51.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 111 — 50 slabs, 2.4% of the 2,070 charted hereACE 4 · CGC 2 · PSA 44AuthAuth — 4 slabs, 0.2% of the 2,070 charted hereCGC 4 (Authentic · Authentic Altered)
Listed · 1 sellers · $206.061 unitsActive fixed-price asks with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and never enter this count.Sold · 30d · 0.2/day6 unitsUnits over the last 30 days, on eBay, against 6 in the 30 days before. Newest reading 2026-09-29.Graded · ACE 34 · CGC 220 · PSA 1,8162,070 slabsEvery slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
ScarcityRoutineA named card at this rarity takes 1 in 144 packs on average, which is the commonest fifth of every card we hold pack odds for. The bands are the card-weighted quintiles of that population, not thresholds we picked.
1 in 144 packs for one copy of this card, estimated1 in 144packsestimatedThe Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Half of all openers get one within 100 packs
Rarest of 2 hit tiers in Legendary TreasuresEvery tier on this ladder comes out of the same pack under the same study, so the position is a like-for-like comparison. It ranks NAMED cards, not tiers: a 12-card tier and a 1-card tier with the same slot odds are not the same difficulty.
Competitive play•Fringe0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days, measured play below the 5% regular threshold.
0.0%-0.0 ppChange in share against the 30-day window ending September 13, 2026, in percentage points.In 2 of 22,383 Standard decklists across 338 events, last 30 days · 1.5 copies per deck that plays it.
What changedWhat changedThe observable that moved, stated before any reason for it — the fact the rest of this panel has to account for.
Modelled guide price moved +0.0% over the trailing 7 days and +0.0% over 30 days, now at $347.37. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanationPrimary explanationThe reading the evidence best supports. It is an explanation, never a forecast, and it is only as good as the Evidence row two lines down.
Primary read: Relative strength scored 26/100 (composite weight 27%). — the largest single contributor to the current ILLIQUID_UNKNOWN regime read.
AlternativeAlternativeA competing explanation the SAME evidence would also support. It is printed even when the primary looks strong: an explanation with no stated alternative is a story, not an analysis.
Alternative explanation: Data quality scored 47/100 (composite weight 17%).. With 1 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, either read is defensible — this is not a high-conviction single-cause move.
EvidenceEvidenceWhat kind of fact this row is. A completed sale, a live ask and a calculated guide price are three different weights of evidence about the same number, and this column is the difference between them.
ObservedObservedThe day the fact was read — not the day the underlying event happened, and not today. An old date is an old reading.
AgeAgeHow long ago this row was read, as of the moment the page was computed.
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight this row carries where it feeds a model, from the resolver that matched it. Lower means a looser match or a thinner source, and a low-confidence row is reweighted rather than dropped.
ModelledModelledYes = a CALCULATED value (a guide price, an estimate); No = something actually observed (a sale, a listing, a census count). A modelled row is evidence about a model, not about the market.
Sweeping 10% of the visible book costs $206.06The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $206.06 ask.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.
50%·$206.06·$206.06 askSweeping 50% of the visible book costs $206.06The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $206.06 ask.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.
80%·$206.06·$206.06 askSweeping 80% of the visible book costs $206.06The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $206.06 ask.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.
Book $206.06Total notional on the visible ask ladder, and the largest single seller's share of it. A book that is mostly one seller's inventory is one decision away from moving.
Mechanics▾
Whole book$206.06
nothing traded — priced at the whole board
Book breadth1 level
1 units on the board
The absorption ladder walks the visible delivered-price ask book cheapest-first: what each slice of the book costs, the ask it leaves marginal, and how far that sits from the last price the card actually traded at. Manipulation risk is the worse of two reads — how many days of this card’s own turnover it would take to absorb the cost of control, and whether the whole buyable book fits inside a single ordinary order.
Flow
—Thin tapeToo little sold-unit evidence to read a pace from — see the note below.
—
Insufficient data
Only 6 units sold in 30 days — under the 8-unit floor for reading a pace.
Method▾
Daily units are the venue's own sold-quantity history, expanded off each bucket's real span, plus confirmed prints from the other side of the market. Prints come from the live sales tape at delivered prices. The floor is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same one FAIR VALUE prices against.
Bottom line
—No callUnder half the model had evidence, so the score is a statement about the inputs that reported rather than about the card. No call until more of them do.
35/100 across 5 of 11 inputs. Against: one buyer can set this price. That is under half the model, so no call is made on it.
Manipulation risk85Manipulation risk85/100RISK-ORIENTED. What it costs to walk the visible book up 50%, against both real trailing volume and one buyer’s cheque book. High here is bad, and it enters the composite inverted.Carries 9% of the composite, inverted: 85 risk entered as 15.Scarcity19Scarcity19/100How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.Carries 7% of the composite.Relative strength26Relative strength26/100This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Carries 7% of the composite.Price trend50Price trend50/1007-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Carries 13% of the composite.Grading upside50Grading upside50/100Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Carries 6% of the composite.
5 of 11 inputs · 42% weight · -29% confidence▾
Not reading yet: value vs fair, money flow, book pressure, liquidity, seller concentration, reprint risk.
Manipulation risk9%85RISK-ORIENTED. What it costs to walk the visible book up 50%, against both real trailing volume and one buyer’s cheque book. High here is bad, and it enters the composite inverted.Scarcity7%19How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.Relative strength7%26This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Price trend13%507-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.
1 in 72 packsest.
Slot odds1 in 72 packsFlipside Gaming — A Comprehensive Review of Rarity in the Pokémon TCG — no sample size published. Nobody has measured this set; this is the rate the rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Era model: Secret Rares are reported at approximately 1 in 72 packs. No set of this era has ever been measured at scale, and the source states a ratio without a sample size. Community measurement, not official odds: nobody publishes physical pack rates.
Cards at rarity2 in Legendary TreasuresCards at rarity2 in Legendary TreasuresCounted from the catalog: 2 printings in Legendary Treasures carry the rarity "Secret Rare".
This card1 in 144 packsest. ±30%This card1 in 144 packsThe era model’s rate for this rarity, split evenly across the 2 cards printed at it. That even split is the estimate's weakest link, and it is bounded rather than hand-waved: a published 8,000-pack study put two Special Illustration Rares from one set at 1 in 309 and 1 in 393 packs — same rarity, same set — so a per-card figure is good to about ±30%.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set. Expected packs is 1/p, the mean of the geometric distribution. The range plots expected pack spend ÷ the single's delivered price on a log axis centred on parity. Pack price is a sealed product's own price divided by its stated pack count, and is computed only where that count carries a source. The single is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same figure FAIR VALUE prices against.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region — the only official drop-rate page covers the digital TCG Live packs and lists no probabilities at all. Every figure here is a hand-entered citation of a published pack-opening study, and each one names its source and sample on hover.
Sealed
—No MSRP on fileThese products are priced, but not one of them carries a recorded MSRP with a source behind it. An MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, and an appreciation measured against nothing is not a judgement this card will invent. The prices are listed below; the comparison is what is missing.
1 of this set’s 3 sealed products carry a price; none carries a recorded MSRP to measure appreciation against.
Set supply · not this card’sThe set's wholesale supply, not this card's — bulk lifts every raw copy in the set.▼Low1 lot listed on 2026-10-13 — higher than 50% of the set's own readings over 29 readings in 90 days.1 lots · CA$125.00 CAD/pack
Method▾
Sealed product from Legendary Treasures — the set this card was printed in. We track which set a product belongs to, not which cards are inside it. Appreciation is each product’s last stored price against its own recorded MSRP, in percent. The card’s call is the MEDIAN of those percentages across the products that have an MSRP — a median rather than a mean, so one outlier SKU cannot carry a whole set — and a product with no MSRP on file is left out of that aggregate rather than counted as zero; it still lists below with its price. MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, so it is shown only where a source is recorded against it, and that source is on the row’s hover. The bands are a legend for the percentage the card prints beside them: within ±5% is at MSRP, which is this repo’s own fair-value tolerance; up to +25% is a slight premium; up to +100% a significant one; at or above +100% the price has at least doubled and the figure is stated as a multiple, because a four-digit percentage is not a number anybody reads. Each price line takes a day’s observed low/high sale range and plots its midpoint; on a day with no recorded sale it carries the provider’s own daily guide value instead — a quoted price, not a transaction — and those days are drawn dashed, never described as trades. Every line is indexed to its own first stored day = 100, so the chart compares appreciation between products rather than price levels: a booster pack and a booster box cannot honestly share a dollar axis.
Restock
—Not trackedThis set has sealed products, but no retailer has ever been read for any of them. Not tracked is not sold out.
3 sealed products in this set, and no retailer has ever been read for any of them — which is not the same as sold out.
Best Buy: not currently tracked.Walmart: not currently tracked.Target: not currently tracked.GameStop: not currently tracked.
0 retailers tracked · 4 not monitoredEvery retailer in the registry has a cell, including the ones that are not tracked — a shelf nobody is watching reads UNKNOWN, never 'sold out'. One store's empty shelf is not the whole market, and an untracked one is not evidence about the market at all.Set-level: Legendary Treasures sealed products, not this cardRetail rows attach to SEALED products only — no big-box retailer sells single cards — so this whole card is the SET's shelf availability. It is not a statement about this card, and a card's own price is unaffected by it.Print status unknownThere is no published source for whether a Pokémon product is still being printed — The Pokémon Company has never announced print cessation in any region, and the annual rotation announcement is about tournament legality, not production. So this is an inference, never a fact, and the verdict above comes from observed shelf readings instead. Nothing direct is on file here — no shelf reading either way and no recorded reprint announcement — and release age plus a price ratio is a hypothesis, not a print status, so no estimate is made.
Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping — never comparable to a delivered price.Retail shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not comparable to the delivered marketplace prices shown elsewhere on this page. They are never fed into a delivered-price floor.Method▾
Each row is one tracked retailer's most recent reading of one of the set's sealed products, at that retailer's own SKU. A restock is an observed OUT_OF_STOCK → IN_STOCK transition in that SKU's reading history, never a change we inferred from a price or a gap. Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not delivered prices and are never fed into a floor.
Slab premium
▲Strong slab premiumThe dearest priced rung is PSA 10 at $9,823.12, 47.7× the $206.06 raw reference (cheapest delivered ask).
A PSA 10 is worth $9,823.12 — 47.7× the $206.06 raw cheapest delivered ask.
Dearest slab per grading company
PSA 10$9,823.1247.7×PSA 10 — $9,823.12, 47.7× raw$30,000.00 · EBAY · 2026-09-27 · $10,046.24 · EBAY · 2026-08-24 · $9,600.00 · FANATICS · 2026-08-02 +1 more print(s)TAG 4$109.410.5×TAG 4 — $109.41, 0.5× raw$109.41 · EBAY · 2026-08-09Raw$206.06askA live listing. Nobody has paid this.1.0×Raw — $206.06, 1.0× rawThe cheapest copy actually listed for sale, delivered — item plus required shipping. An offer, not a price anybody has paid. Every multiple on this ladder is taken against it.
PSA 10 is the dearest slab on the board at $9,823.12; the next priced grader is TAG 4 at $109.41.
One rung down, a PSA 9 is $900.00 — 4.4× raw.
ACE (34 slabs), CGC (220 slabs) have no priced comp at any grade — nothing has been paid for one we can see.
Grading ROI
▲GradePSA: +$127.10 expected, still +$74.83 at the 95% lower bound of the gem share — break-even needs 1% gems; observed 3% (95% floor 2%, n=1816).
Best on PSA: +$127.10 expected, still +$74.83 at the 95% lower bound of the gem share — break-even needs 1% gems; observed 3% (95% floor 2%, n=1816).
Odds of a 10 vs what it takes
PSA needs 1% tens to break even; the census shows 3%, with a 95% interval of 2% to 3% on 1816 slabs.
break-even 1.0%Break-even1.0%The 10 rate this submission would need just to cover the raw price and the fee. It is the white line on the meter above: the solid segment has to clear it before grading is worth doing at all.observed 2.5% [1.9%–3.4%] n=1816Observed 10 rate2.5%Measured over 1816 graded copies in the census, with a 95% interval of 1.9%–3.4% around it — the band on the meter IS that interval, and it is the width of the doubt, not of the opportunity. A small n makes it wide.
VendorVendorThe grading company, one row each. Rows are the graders we hold both a fee schedule and a population census for — a grader we cannot price is left out rather than estimated.
FeeFeeThe all-in submission cost per card at this grader: grading tier plus shipping both ways and insurance, as published. A † marks a fee we could not read from a published schedule and had to carry from a prior reading. Lower is better.
P(10)P(10)The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
10 price10 priceWhat a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
ROI(10)ROI(10)Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
Pre-grade this card →Photograph your own copy front and back for centering, wear and the odds of each grade. An estimate, not a grade.
$206.06 raw (cheapest delivered ask) + $59.99 PSA Standard + $25.00 ship/ins = $291.05 · less 13.25% sale fee · 45d lockup
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Secret Rare
~1 in 144
Secret Rare — 2 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Secret Rare is 1 in 144 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Ultra Rare~1 in 90Ultra Rare — 5 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Ultra Rare is 1 in 90 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Hit tiers in Legendary Treasures, hardest at the top. Log scale.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set; the figure shown is 1/p, the mean number of packs to one copy. The ladder plots every tier of the set on a logarithmic scale, because a set spans two orders of magnitude between its commonest hit and its hardest and a linear scale would pin all but one of them to the same end.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Print scarcity
•Set not coveredA set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. Legendary Treasures does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
A set needs at least three cards carrying a price, a graded population and a pull rate at once before its print scale means anything. Legendary Treasures does not reach that, so there is nothing to rank this card against.
LightModerateHeavy
Model inputs
Graded copies2,070 copiesGraded copies2,070 copiesSlabs on record across PSA, CGC and ACE, summed over every grade. The model’s raw input — it is NOT the print run, because a card people grade often will show a large population off a small press run. Ungraded and sealed copies are invisible to it.Packs per copy1 in 144Packs per copy1 in 144How many packs it takes to see one named copy of this card — the same figure SCARCITY leads with. It is what converts a set-wide print scale into this card’s own.
Method▾
Graded population is print run × how often anyone bothers grading it, and the second factor moves with VALUE — so population is divided by price^0.606, the elasticity fitted across 3,826 cards that carry a population, a price and a pull rate at once. That normalised count is turned into a SET pack scale using the card’s pull rate (every card in a set is an independent read on how many packs exist, pooled by median), then brought back down to this card by its own pull rate. The band is a tertile of the result across every card that clears the gates.
Nobody has ever published a Pokémon print run, and this does not recover one — it is an ORDER, not a count. It reads surviving graded supply across PSA, CGC and ACE, so ungraded and sealed stock are invisible to it. What it is checked against: the model puts Black & White at the bottom of the catalog and modern Scarlet & Violet at the top, which is where the smallest and largest print runs actually are.
Mean copies per deck that runs it, over the 2 decks that do; never averaged against the decks that do not. The bar is scaled to 4, the per-deck limit.
Top-cut lift0.00×0% of 3,647 top-cut decklists run it, against 0.0% of the whole field. Above 1.00 it is over-represented where the money is. Withheld under 20 top-cut decklists.
Deck spread0.501 minus the concentration of this card across the deck archetypes that run it. 1.00 is spread evenly over many decks; 0 is one deck. At or above 0.5 concentration this is a ONE-DECK CARD: its demand rises and falls with a single archetype.
Player floor$0.10The cheapest currently-priced Standard-legal print of this card: Reshiram, Stellar Crown. What it costs to put the card in a deck, which is not the same question as what THIS print is worth.Premium over floor3474×This printing's headline price ($347.37) against the player floor ($0.10). What a player pays for THIS art rather than for the cheapest legal copy of the same card.Playset$0.151.5 copies (the mean per deck that runs it) at the player floor of $0.10. What the decks on file actually bought.30d sold4 units (0% vs prior 30d)Units of THIS printing sold in the 30 days ending October 13, 2026, against the 30 days before that (4). Demand at a table and demand in the market are different measurements; this is the second one.Meta vs priceρ +0.73 (14 weeks)Spearman rank correlation of weekly share against weekly median price over the trailing 26 weeks, on the weeks carrying both. Printed only at 8 weeks or more; below that the count is stated instead of a coefficient off a handful of readings.
Meta share · % of Standard decklists (right axis)Median price · this print, $ (left axis)Units sold per day (bars)
Does the meta move the price? Share of Standard decklists running this card against this print's median sale price and units sold, day by day; the rank correlation above is printed once 8 weeks exist.
Fringe at 0.0% of Standard decklists, -0.0 pp on the prior window. A playset costs $0.15 at the cheapest legal print.
94.5% of card lines in these decklists matched a card in our catalog; an unmatched line is never counted. Online events only, not Regionals or Worlds. Tournament results →
Card text▾
HP130
TypesFire
StageBasic
AttacksCC Outrage · 20Cost: Colorless · ColorlessDoes 10 more damage for each damage counter on this Pokémon.RRC Blue Flare · 120Cost: Fire · Fire · ColorlessDiscard 2 Fire Energy attached to this Pokémon.
WeaknessWater ×2
Retreat2
LegalStandard ✗not legal · Expanded ✓legal
EvidenceEvidenceThe specific observations the explanation rests on. If this row is thin, treat the explanation as thin — it is the only thing holding it up.
Evidence: item-basis daily bars, TCGplayer active listings, absorption read ("Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).").
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight to put on the primary explanation, given how much of the evidence actually resolved. It qualifies the row above; it never adds to it.
Confidence: 90% (floor-confidence 31/100), based on 975 days of observations.
What would disprove itWhat would disprove itThe observation that would break the primary explanation. It is what makes the reading falsifiable rather than unfalsifiable — and it is the thing to watch for next.
This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.
CatalogCard identity: set, number, rarity, finish, release date. It dates from the printing itself, so an old reading here is expected and is not staleness.
Nov 6, 2013
12.9y
98%
No
Live askA copy offered for sale right now. An ask is what a seller wants, not what anyone paid — it bounds the price from above until it clears.
Oct 1, 2026
13d
90%
No
Open auctionA running auction carrying at least one bid. A bid is a real commitment to buy, but the auction has not closed, so it is not yet a sale.
Sep 11, 2026
33d
90%
No
Guide priceA calculated market guide — a model of where the product is trading. Never a confirmed sale, and always marked Modelled.
Oct 13, 2026
23h
90%
Yes
Inventory countHow many copies and listings stand on the book. What depth, supply and absorption are measured against.
Sep 12, 2026
32d
70%
No
Population censusA grader's published count of the copies it has slabbed at each grade. A record of what was submitted and kept, never the odds a copy grades.
Oct 11, 2026
2d
60%
No
Raw · Normal · Near MintWhat every row above was gathered for — one printing, in this one finish and condition or grade. Change either switcher in the header and you are reading a different one; the page's own URL is the address of exactly this one.pq-quant-2026.10.0The version of the scoring and analytics formulas that produced everything on this page. Two figures computed under different versions are not comparable, which is why the version is stated rather than assumed.
Grading upside6%50Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.
Value vs fair17%no readingFair value returned UNKNOWN — too few comparable prints to anchor an estimate.
Money flow11%no readingNo confirmed prints with a contemporaneous ask to classify against.
Book pressure11%no readingNeeds a 30-day inventory change, or book counts spanning ≥3 days that move at all and rest on ≥8 listings. Collection of `inventory_observations` began 2026-09-02.
Liquidity9%no readingFewer than two of the four participation readings could be measured — no trade count, and no book to read a queue or a seller base off.
Seller concentration5%no readingThe venue attributes no seller identity to these asks.
Reprint risk5%no readingPrint status is unestablished — no shelf observation and no recorded reprint event.
Competitive meta+2A BONUS on top of the weighted composite, never a penalty: 20% of Standard decklists or more adds 8, 5% or more adds 5, and any measured play at all adds 2. A card nobody plays is not marked down for it. Measured on 0.0% of 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days.
The bottom line is a weighted mean of the signals that reported, renormalised so their weights sum to 1. Nothing defaults to a neutral 50: an input with no evidence is reweighted away and its absence is charged as a confidence penalty. Risk rows (manipulation, concentration, reprint) enter inverted. Data quality carries no weight at all — it decides whether the verdict may be spoken, because knowing a lot about a card is not a reason to buy it. Competitive meta sits OUTSIDE the weighted mean as a capped bonus added after it: a card nobody plays is never marked down for that, and a card the meta is built on can be marked up for it.
The Booster Pack's most recent plotted day carries the provider’s daily guide value — no sale was recorded that day.
Indexed to the Booster Pack’s own first stored day = 100 · dashed = guide price, no sale that day.Each line is that product’s own price divided by its own first stored day and multiplied by 100, so every series starts on the dotted rule and the axis measures APPRECIATION rather than price. Dollars could not do this job here: a booster pack and a booster box differ by two orders of magnitude, and on a shared dollar axis the pack would sit flat on the floor of the plot however far it had actually travelled. The Booster Pack is the base unit and is drawn in front; the rest are drawn behind it, and each one’s own numbers are in the table below. A dashed stretch is a run of days with no recorded sale, carrying the provider’s daily guide value — a quoted price, never a trade.
Appreciation vs MSRP
ProductPriceMSRPvs MSRPEvery sealed product the catalog holds for this set, ordered by how standard a unit each is for tracking a set’s sealed price. PRICE is the product’s last stored day — a sale where one was recorded, the provider’s daily guide value where none was, and the row’s hover says which. MSRP is blank wherever no source is recorded against one, because an MSRP with nobody behind it is not a fact. VS MSRP is the price against that MSRP, as a percentage up to a doubling and as a multiple past it.
Booster Pack$382.43——Legendary Treasures Booster Pack—Legendary Treasures Booster Pack. Quoted at $382.43 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Booster Box———Legendary Treasures Booster Box—Legendary Treasures Booster Box. No stored price bar — nothing has been observed to trade, which is not the same as trading at zero. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Sleeved Booster Pack Art Bundle [Set of 4]———Legendary Treasures Sleeved Booster Pack Art Bundle [Set of 4]—Legendary Treasures Sleeved Booster Pack Art Bundle [Set of 4]. No stored price bar — nothing has been observed to trade, which is not the same as trading at zero. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.
Risk-wtdRisk-wtdThe same return weighted by the odds of each grade, not just the 10 — the number to compare graders on, because a high P(10) at a high fee can lose to a lower one. A leading ≈ means the full grade distribution was unavailable and a coarser method stood in. Higher is better.
ACE
$24.39ACE Basic — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. £18.00 converted at GBP/USD 1.355 (2026-09-01) — a conversion, not a quoted USD price. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Core $16.26, Value $20.33.
0.0%95% interval 0.0%–10.2% on n=34. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for ACE, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no ACE price at grade 10 at any basis.
BGS
$79.95BGS Express — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-09-01. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Base $14.95.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for BGS, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no BGS population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
CGC
$20.00CGC Economy — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Bulk $17.00.
0.5%95% interval 0.1%–2.5% on n=220. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for CGC, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no CGC price at grade 10 at any basis.
PSA
$59.99PSA Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Value Bulk $24.99, Value $32.99.
2.5%95% interval 1.9%–3.4% on n=1816. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$9,823.12What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
+2828%+$8,230.51 on a $291.05 cost basis.
≈+98%Only 90% of the PSA distribution is priced, so this falls back to P(10)·ROI(10) + (1−P(10))·ROI(pooled sub-10 price).
TAG
$59.95TAG Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Basic $22.00.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for TAG, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no TAG population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
