Mewtwo GX — 76/73Raw · Holo · Near MintEvery price, print, listing and score on this page belongs to this one printing in this one condition or grade — switch either dropdown and you are looking at a different one.
A different printing of this card — a reverse holo, a promo stamp, another language. Choosing one NAVIGATES: every price, print, listing and score on the page belongs to that printing instead, because they are separate instruments that trade at different prices.The condition or grade being priced. Each one is a separate instrument that trades at its own price, so choosing one replaces every figure on the page. “All conditions” and “All grades” are a union of the siblings — their tape, listings and volume are combined, with one sibling named as the reference for price and analytics.
▁Floor FormingFloor FormingPrice is stabilising near a drawdown low, volatility is cooling and depth has stopped thinning. A floor being tested — not yet one that has held.•At Fair ValueAt Fair ValueThe market price is inside the blended fair-value band, so no direction is called. A wide band puts more prices inside it, which is why the band is shown and not just the point.⇈AccumulationAccumulationBoth directions agree over the flow window: net dollars cleared at or above the prevailing ask, AND the top-decile-notional prints skewed the same way. Direction of confirmed prints only — never a forecast.1D·ask0.0%1D return (ask-based)0.0%No print in this window — every bar closed on the same provider guide value, so the sold-price reading would be a confident 0%. This is the delivered ask floor's own change over the same window instead: a real move nobody has yet paid, not a sale.7D+0.4%7D return+0.4%Change in the headline market price against the close 7 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.30D+1.1%30D return+1.1%Change in the headline market price against the close 30 observed bars back. Bars exist only for days this card actually traded, so the span can be longer than the label's calendar reading.As of 20:45ZAs of 20:45ZThe market price, its 1D/7D/30D returns, the order book, the For Sale counts and today’s price bar as they stood when this page was built. The page itself is served from a shared cache, so this stamp — not the moment you loaded it — is how old these numbers are. Your browser re-reads them a moment after the page arrives and this line follows.
Mkt Price
$96.51item·0.0%
Last $99.99 · $102.98 delivered · 4d
Mkt Price$96.51 itemThe venue’s published daily market guide, which the venue itself declares MODELLED. Nothing is confirmed to have traded at it, no copy is listed at it, and it is not our estimate — it is theirs. It is quoted on the ITEM basis — the basis every wall tile is quoted on — and it is what the chart plots on a day with no print of its own. Last confirmed fixed-price sale: $99.99 at 2026-10-09T08:28:46.100Z. Delivered $102.98 with shipping. One trade, not a statistic — the figure above it is the day's median.
Fair Value
$98.83delivered
≈$97.84 item · Band $92.46–$105.20
Fair Value$98.83 deliveredBand is ±6.4% of the point estimate: 2 of 4 components available (excluded: depth clearing, auction clearing — 40% of weight reweighted away, 20% confidence penalty), on 10 observation(s) in the trailing 30d. Thin samples and missing components widen the band 3.22x over the raw component spread. No recent clearing price: too few prints in the last 120h to say what it is trading at now. A weighted blend of independent estimates, quoted DELIVERED — item plus required shipping — where Mkt Price beside it may be item basis. Read the band, not the point: its width is the model's own confidence. On the ITEM basis TCGplayer’s guide is quoted on, that is about $97.84 — this card’s own prints carry a median delivered-minus-item wedge of $0.99, measured day by day, never an assumed postage rate.
Liquidity
55/100
Fair liquidity
Liquidity55 /100How easily a position clears, scored 0–100. Four readings, equally weighted, each independently nullable: trade rate (the chance it trades today, from 30d units sold), trade breadth (how many of the last 30 days carried a trade), queue clearance (30d units sold against the units on the board) and seller dispersion (how many different people are selling it). A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight — never filled in with a zero.
30D Vol
33units▲+136%
units · vs prior 30d
30D Vol33 units33 units over the last 30 days, on eBay and TCGplayer. Newest reading Oct 11, 2026. Against 14 in the 30 days before.
For Sale
3units
3 sellers
For Sale3 unitsEvery active fixed-price ask with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and are never counted here.
Graded Pop
3,767▲+0.8%
across 3 graders
Graded Pop3,767Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds a copy grades 10.
No live auction bids — this market has no resting bid book.
Cross-Market BasisAsks are live fixed-price listings at delivered prices (item + required shipping). No bid side exists: this market has no resting bid book. There are no live auction bids and no published buylist for this instrument, so the bid side is empty rather than synthesized from asks, price history or a spread assumption.——
AskSize
Ask sideLive fixed-price listings, priced DELIVERED — item plus required shipping. Cheapest first; a listing whose shipping is unknown has no delivered price and is excluded rather than guessed at.
$101.101
$101.10 · 1 unit1 cum.Ask size at this price, and the running total through it from the cheapest ask — 1 unit are buyable at or under $101.10 delivered. The shaded staircase behind the row IS that running total.
$104.701
$104.70 · 1 unit2 cum.Ask size at this price, and the running total through it from the cheapest ask — 2 units are buyable at or under $104.70 delivered. The shaded staircase behind the row IS that running total.
$126.471
$126.47 · 1 unit3 cum.Ask size at this price, and the running total through it from the cheapest ask — 3 units are buyable at or under $126.47 delivered. The shaded staircase behind the row IS that running total.
Ask depth$332.27Ask depth$332.27Every live fixed-price ask summed at its DELIVERED price — what clearing the whole visible book would cost. There is no bid side to set it against: no auction has a bid on it and no buylist quotes this instrument, and an absent side is never drawn as a zero.
One candle per UTC day — the finest grain this market recordsOne candle per ISO week (Mon–Sun), rolled up from the daily barsOne candle per calendar month, rolled up from the daily barsitem — the sale price alone, excluding shipping. This is the basis TCGplayer’s own market guide is published on, and the basis every wall tile, screener row and watchlist quote uses, so it is what the headline compares against.delivered — item + required shipping, the basis every alarm, floor and fair value uses. A print whose shipping the venue never stated has no delivered price and is excluded from the bar rather than counted at its item price; a day with no priced print falls back to the guide, which is an item price and says so.
How each period is drawn. Candles and bars show the full observed open/high/low/close; line and area show the close alone. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
Fair valueFAIRThe cheapest delivered ask is within 5% of the blended fair-value estimate (FAIR_VALUE_AT_FAIR_TOLERANCE_PCT).
Fair value $98.83 delivered, about $97.84 on the item basis; the cheapest delivered ask is 2.3% above it$98.83delivered+2.3%The cheapest delivered ask ($101.10) against the blended fair-value estimate.top 74%top 74% of 6,088 tracked on FV gap · Ranked against every tracked card as of Oct 13, 2026; the number above is live.
$98.83
Chase
—Pack count unknownA priced sealed product exists, but nothing on record says how many packs are inside it. Defaulting a booster box to 36 packs is true for most modern sets and false for enough of them that the guess would sit invisibly inside a dollar figure, so the card withholds instead.
1 in 72 packs for secret rare, shared by 5 cards in Shining Legends — but nothing on record says how many packs are in this set's sealed products, and a guessed pack count would sit invisibly inside the spend figure.
Breakdown
RaritySecret RareRaritySecret RareThe provider's own spelling, verbatim. The odds row and this printing have to carry the same string or no estimate is made — a mismatch must produce nothing rather than another rarity's rate.Slot odds
Supply
▲Tight supply3 listed units against a 1.1/day pace is 2.7 days of stock. Under 7d reads tight, 30d or more reads heavy.
3 units listed across 3 sellers — 2.7d of stock at the 30-day pace of 1.1/day.
PopulationAll graders pooled3,767Every slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, as each of them states its own total. A share of what was submitted and kept — never the odds a copy grades 10. The bars below sum to 3,771, not 3,767: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.ACE60Slabs ACE itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.CGC469Slabs CGC itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve.PSA3,238Slabs PSA itself reports for this card. Switching tabs changes the whole chart below to that grader's own grade curve. The bars below sum to 3,242, not 3,238: a grader can report a pooled rung and its qualified variants separately, so the stated total is the authority and the bars are what is chartable.
1010 — 1,181 slabs, 31.3% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 16 · CGC 45 (Gem Mint 10 · Perfect 10 · Pristine 10) · PSA 1,1209.59.5 — 8 slabs, 0.2% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 899 — 1,699 slabs, 45.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 24 · CGC 156 · PSA 1,5198.58.5 — 160 slabs, 4.2% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 156 · PSA 488 — 533 slabs, 14.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 11 · CGC 70 · PSA 4527.57.5 — 9 slabs, 0.2% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 977 — 81 slabs, 2.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 3 · CGC 9 · PSA 696.56.5 — 5 slabs, 0.1% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 566 — 40 slabs, 1.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 2 · CGC 1 · PSA 375.55.5 — 4 slabs, 0.1% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 455 — 28 slabs, 0.7% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 1 · CGC 3 · PSA 2444 — 6 slabs, 0.2% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 1 · PSA 53.53.5 — 1 slabs, 0.0% of the 3,771 charted hereCGC 133 — 8 slabs, 0.2% of the 3,771 charted herePSA 822 — 2 slabs, 0.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 1 · PSA 111 — 3 slabs, 0.1% of the 3,771 charted herePSA 3AuthAuth — 3 slabs, 0.1% of the 3,771 charted hereACE 2 (Authentic · qualified) · CGC 1
Listed · 3 sellers · $332.273 unitsActive fixed-price asks with a known delivered price. Auctions are a separate market and never enter this count.Sold · 30d · 1.1/day33 unitsUnits over the last 30 days, on eBay and TCGplayer, against 14 in the 30 days before. Newest reading 2026-10-11.Graded · ACE 60 · CGC 469 · PSA 3,2383,767 slabsEvery slab reported by every grader we hold a census for, pooled. A share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
ScarcityScarceA named card at this rarity takes 1 in 360 packs on average, which is the middle fifth of every card we hold pack odds for. The bands are the card-weighted quintiles of that population, not thresholds we picked.
1 in 360 packs for one copy of this card, estimated1 in 360packsestimatedThe Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Half of all openers get one within 250 packs
Rarest of 2 hit tiers in Shining LegendsEvery tier on this ladder comes out of the same pack under the same study, so the position is a like-for-like comparison. It ranks NAMED cards, not tiers: a 12-card tier and a 1-card tier with the same slot odds are not the same difficulty.
Competitive play▼Not Standard-legalPublished as not legal in Standard, and in none of the 22,383 Standard decklists in the last 30 days.
Not legal in Standard, and in none of the 22,383 Standard decklists across 338 events, last 30 days.
30d sold31 units (+107% vs prior 30d)Units of THIS printing sold in the 30 days ending October 13, 2026, against the 30 days before that (15). Demand at a table and demand in the market are different measurements; this is the second one.Meta vs priceNot enough history (0 weeks)Spearman rank correlation of weekly share against weekly median price over the trailing 26 weeks, on the weeks carrying both. Printed only at 8 weeks or more; below that the count is stated instead of a coefficient off a handful of readings.
94.5% of card lines in these decklists matched a card in our catalog; an unmatched line is never counted. Online events only, not Regionals or Worlds.
Why It's Moving
What changedWhat changedThe observable that moved, stated before any reason for it — the fact the rest of this panel has to account for.
Modelled guide price moved +0.4% over the trailing 7 days and +1.1% over 30 days, now at $96.51. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.
Primary explanationPrimary explanationThe reading the evidence best supports. It is an explanation, never a forecast, and it is only as good as the Evidence row two lines down.
Primary read: Price trend scored 99/100 (composite weight 31%). — the largest single contributor to the current FLOOR_FORMING regime read.
AlternativeAlternativeA competing explanation the SAME evidence would also support. It is printed even when the primary looks strong: an explanation with no stated alternative is a story, not an analysis.
Alternative explanation: Relative strength scored 64/100 (composite weight 21%).. With 3 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, either read is defensible — this is not a high-conviction single-cause move.
EvidenceEvidenceWhat kind of fact this row is. A completed sale, a live ask and a calculated guide price are three different weights of evidence about the same number, and this column is the difference between them.
ObservedObservedThe day the fact was read — not the day the underlying event happened, and not today. An old date is an old reading.
AgeAgeHow long ago this row was read, as of the moment the page was computed.
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight this row carries where it feeds a model, from the resolver that matched it. Lower means a looser match or a thinner source, and a low-confidence row is reweighted rather than dropped.
ModelledModelledYes = a CALCULATED value (a guide price, an estimate); No = something actually observed (a sale, a listing, a census count). A modelled row is evidence about a model, not about the market.
The blend’s point estimate — the weighted centre of the four component reads listed below. It is the middle of a band, not a target: read the band’s width before the point.
$101.10Market price$101.10What the market is actually asking right now — the cheapest delivered price, or the newest confirmed print when no ladder exists. The card’s verdict is where this line falls against the band.
Sales VWAP$100.07Trend anchor$96.36
$92.46The bottom of the stated fair-value band — the cheap end of the blend, not a floor and not a support level. A wider band is the model saying it is less sure, so the two ends are more informative together than the point between them.$105.20The top of the stated fair-value band — the rich end of the blend, not a ceiling and not a target. A wider band is the model saying it is less sure, so the two ends are more informative together than the point between them.
Sales VWAP$100.0767%Sales VWAP$100.07Time-decayed, unit-weighted mean delivered price of confirmed prints — the last 48h dominate.Weight 67% of the blend, after reweighting away the inputs with no evidence.Depth clearingN/A—Depth clearingN/AUnavailable in the trailing 30d window — reweighted away, not defaulted.No evidence for this input, so it carries no weight — the blend is the other components, reweighted.Trend anchor$96.3633%Trend anchor$96.36Last non-null trend value (SMA) of the price series, in delivered terms.Weight 33% of the blend, after reweighting away the inputs with no evidence.Auction clearingN/A—Auction clearingN/AUnavailable in the trailing 30d window — reweighted away, not defaulted.No evidence for this input, so it carries no weight — the blend is the other components, reweighted.
≈$97.84 item basis · ±6.4% band · 2 of 4 inputs · 10 obs / 30dBand is ±6.4% of the point estimate: 2 of 4 components available (excluded: depth clearing, auction clearing — 40% of weight reweighted away, 20% confidence penalty), on 10 observation(s) in the trailing 30d. Thin samples and missing components widen the band 3.22x over the raw component spread. No recent clearing price: too few prints in the last 120h to say what it is trading at now.
›Priced at fair — cheapest delivered ask $101.10.
Market safety
▲High riskOne buyer can set this price on at least one dimension: a spike here would outlive the 30-day window every number we publish is measured over, or the whole buyable book is inside a single ordinary order (under 5 units).
$332.27 clears the cheap side — 3 units, fewer than one ordinary order (0.11 book-months, 3 asks).
Book
10%·$101.10·$101.10 ask+6%Sweeping 10% of the visible book costs $101.10The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $101.10 ask — +6% against today's cheapest.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.50%·$205.80·$104.70 ask+9%Sweeping 50% of the visible book costs $205.80The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $104.70 ask — +9% against today's cheapest.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.80%·$332.27·$126.47 ask+32%Sweeping 80% of the visible book costs $332.27The next unbought ask after that sweep sits at $126.47 ask — +32% against today's cheapest.Visible asks only, at delivered prices. An unshipped listing has no delivered price and is not in this ladder.Book $332.27Total notional on the visible ask ladder, and the largest single seller's share of it. A book that is mostly one seller's inventory is one decision away from moving.Best ask vs fair · $101.10 vs $98.83+2.3%Best ask vs fair+2.3%$101.10 vs $98.83
Mechanics▾
Cost to +50%$332.27
clears the entire visible book
Days to absorb2.2
3 units to control
Book breadth1 level
3 units on the board
Book / 30d sold0.11x
30d traded $2,958
VenuesTCGplayer
The absorption ladder walks the visible delivered-price ask book cheapest-first: what each slice of the book costs, the ask it leaves marginal, and how far that sits from the last price the card actually traded at. Manipulation risk is the worse of two reads — how many days of this card’s own turnover it would take to absorb the cost of control, and whether the whole buyable book fits inside a single ordinary order.
Flow
—SteadyThis week's daily sold units overlap the middle half of the rest of the window, so no change in pace is separable from the noise. Trading at its own normal rate.
5 sold in 7d, 0.6× the 30d pace — 30d prints clear at $85.00 median, -15.9% vs the $101.10 floor.
This week 5 · last week 11 · 30d/wk 8
Recent prints
$52.00-48.6%2d ago$52.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-11T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$75.04-25.8%3d ago$75.04 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-10T07:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$99.99-1.1%3d ago$99.99 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-10T00:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.$102.98
Method▾
Daily units are the venue's own sold-quantity history, expanded off each bucket's real span, plus confirmed prints from the other side of the market. Prints come from the live sales tape at delivered prices. The floor is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same one FAIR VALUE prices against.
Over 30d: 10 confirmed print(s); net flow +$597.66 across 8 buy-side vs 2 sell-side unit(s); large prints (>= $103.93) were 12% of notional and skewed buy-side -> ACCUMULATING.
Bottom line
—Hold60/100 on the weighted composite: at or above 65 is a buy, at or below 35 a sell, and everything between is a hold.
60/100 across 9 of 11 inputs. For: price trend reads 99/100. Against: one buyer can set this price.
Price trend99Price trend99/1007-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Carries 13% of the composite.Manipulation risk85Manipulation risk85/100RISK-ORIENTED. What it costs to walk the visible book up 50%, against both real trailing volume and one buyer’s cheque book. High here is bad, and it enters the composite inverted.Carries 9% of the composite, inverted: 85 risk entered as 15.Book pressure70Book pressure70/100Supply leaving the market or refilling it. Prefers the 30-day inventory change; falls back to the venue's own listing count over the readings held, capped tighter because a shorter window is weaker evidence. Withheld on a count that never moves, or on a book so small that one listing's arrival pins the percent to a rail.Carries 11% of the composite.Money flow68Money flow68/100Confirmed prints split into buy-side and sell-side against the prevailing ask, on a log scale — one decade of imbalance earns the full swing, because 100:1 is a thinner sample saying what 10:1 already said.Carries 11% of the composite.Relative strength64Relative strength64/100This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.Carries 7% of the composite.Value vs fair45Value vs fair45/100The cheapest delivered ask against the blended fair-value estimate, two points per percent. Above 50 the card is trading under what the evidence says it is worth. Withheld entirely when fair value declares itself UNKNOWN — a discount measured against an untrustworthy anchor is not a discount.Carries 17% of the composite.Scarcity58Scarcity58/100How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.Carries 7% of the composite.Liquidity55Liquidity55/100Four equally-weighted readings of what counterparties did: the chance it trades today, how many of the last 30 days carried a trade, 30-day units sold against the units on the board, and how many different people are selling it. A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight.Carries 9% of the composite.Grading upside51Grading upside51/100Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.Carries 6% of the composite.
9 of 11 inputs · 90% weight · -5% confidence▾
Not reading yet: seller concentration, reprint risk.
Price trend13%997-day and 30-day returns read against the noise of this card’s own series. Above 50 the price moved further than its own noise explains; below 50 it moved the other way. Withheld on a window with no confirmed print, where the line is the relay’s published guide and the return would be a reading of its revision schedule.Manipulation risk9%85RISK-ORIENTED. What it costs to walk the visible book up 50%, against both real trailing volume and one buyer’s cheque book. High here is bad, and it enters the composite inverted.Book pressure11%70Supply leaving the market or refilling it. Prefers the 30-day inventory change; falls back to the venue's own listing count over the readings held, capped tighter because a shorter window is weaker evidence. Withheld on a count that never moves, or on a book so small that one listing's arrival pins the percent to a rail.Money flow11%68Confirmed prints split into buy-side and sell-side against the prevailing ask, on a log scale — one decade of imbalance earns the full swing, because 100:1 is a thinner sample saying what 10:1 already said.
1 in 72 packsest.
Slot odds1 in 72 packsFlipside Gaming — A Comprehensive Review of Rarity in the Pokémon TCG — no sample size published. Nobody has measured this set; this is the rate the rarity measured at across sets of the same era. Era model: Secret Rares are reported at approximately 1 in 2 booster boxes — 1 in 72 packs at 36 packs to a box. No set of this era has ever been measured at scale, and the source states a ratio without a sample size. Community measurement, not official odds: nobody publishes physical pack rates.
Cards at rarity5 in Shining LegendsCards at rarity5 in Shining LegendsCounted from the catalog: 5 printings in Shining Legends carry the rarity "Secret Rare".
This card1 in 360 packsest. ±30%This card1 in 360 packsThe era model’s rate for this rarity, split evenly across the 5 cards printed at it. That even split is the estimate's weakest link, and it is bounded rather than hand-waved: a published 8,000-pack study put two Special Illustration Rares from one set at 1 in 309 and 1 in 393 packs — same rarity, same set — so a per-card figure is good to about ±30%.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set. Expected packs is 1/p, the mean of the geometric distribution. The range plots expected pack spend ÷ the single's delivered price on a log axis centred on parity. Pack price is a sealed product's own price divided by its stated pack count, and is computed only where that count carries a source. The single is the cheapest delivered ask (item + required shipping) across venues — the same figure FAIR VALUE prices against.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region — the only official drop-rate page covers the digital TCG Live packs and lists no probabilities at all. Every figure here is a hand-entered citation of a published pack-opening study, and each one names its source and sample on hover.
Sealed
—No MSRP on fileThese products are priced, but not one of them carries a recorded MSRP with a source behind it. An MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, and an appreciation measured against nothing is not a judgement this card will invent. The prices are listed below; the comparison is what is missing.
11 of this set’s 13 sealed products carry a price; none carries a recorded MSRP to measure appreciation against.
Set supply · not this card’sThe set's wholesale supply, not this card's — bulk lifts every raw copy in the set.▼Low4 lots listed on 2026-10-13 — higher than 50% of the set's own readings over 29 readings in 90 days.4 lots
Method▾
Sealed product from Shining Legends — the set this card was printed in. We track which set a product belongs to, not which cards are inside it. Appreciation is each product’s last stored price against its own recorded MSRP, in percent. The card’s call is the MEDIAN of those percentages across the products that have an MSRP — a median rather than a mean, so one outlier SKU cannot carry a whole set — and a product with no MSRP on file is left out of that aggregate rather than counted as zero; it still lists below with its price. MSRP is somebody’s assertion rather than a published dataset, so it is shown only where a source is recorded against it, and that source is on the row’s hover. The bands are a legend for the percentage the card prints beside them: within ±5% is at MSRP, which is this repo’s own fair-value tolerance; up to +25% is a slight premium; up to +100% a significant one; at or above +100% the price has at least doubled and the figure is stated as a multiple, because a four-digit percentage is not a number anybody reads. Each price line takes a day’s observed low/high sale range and plots its midpoint; on a day with no recorded sale it carries the provider’s own daily guide value instead — a quoted price, not a transaction — and those days are drawn dashed, never described as trades. Every line is indexed to its own first stored day = 100, so the chart compares appreciation between products rather than price levels: a booster pack and a booster box cannot honestly share a dollar axis.
Restock
—Not trackedThis set has sealed products, but no retailer has ever been read for any of them. Not tracked is not sold out.
13 sealed products in this set, and no retailer has ever been read for any of them — which is not the same as sold out.
Best Buy: not currently tracked.Walmart: not currently tracked.Target: not currently tracked.GameStop: not currently tracked.
0 retailers tracked · 4 not monitoredEvery retailer in the registry has a cell, including the ones that are not tracked — a shelf nobody is watching reads UNKNOWN, never 'sold out'. One store's empty shelf is not the whole market, and an untracked one is not evidence about the market at all.Set-level: Shining Legends sealed products, not this cardRetail rows attach to SEALED products only — no big-box retailer sells single cards — so this whole card is the SET's shelf availability. It is not a statement about this card, and a card's own price is unaffected by it.Print status unknownThere is no published source for whether a Pokémon product is still being printed — The Pokémon Company has never announced print cessation in any region, and the annual rotation announcement is about tournament legality, not production. So this is an inference, never a fact, and the verdict above comes from observed shelf readings instead. Nothing direct is on file here — no shelf reading either way and no recorded reprint announcement — and release age plus a price ratio is a hypothesis, not a print status, so no estimate is made.
Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping — never comparable to a delivered price.Retail shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not comparable to the delivered marketplace prices shown elsewhere on this page. They are never fed into a delivered-price floor.Method▾
Each row is one tracked retailer's most recent reading of one of the set's sealed products, at that retailer's own SKU. A restock is an observed OUT_OF_STOCK → IN_STOCK transition in that SKU's reading history, never a change we inferred from a price or a gap. Shelf prices are pre-tax and exclude shipping, so they are not delivered prices and are never fed into a floor.
Absorption
—Building historyToo few readings of the book to tell a drawdown from noise. The count is on the card — see the note below.
24 readings of this book so far, one per 1 day, over 29d. The direction reads once there are enough of them to tell a drawdown from noise.
Method▾
Each reading takes the venue's own listing count for this card in this condition — the whole book — at that instant. The direction is classified by the platform's absorption reading over that series: a book drawn down with demand behind it reads as accumulation, one that refills after a drawdown reads as distribution. Copies and sellers come from the cheapest asks we sample, not from the book, and are labelled as such. Sold units are confirmed prints from the live tape over the same span, and are shown only when the tape reaches back past the first reading.
The direction is classified over the platform-standard 30-day trailing window. That window is a scope, not a history: it contains exactly the readings counted on this card and no others — and only readings that counted the venue’s own book, never a sampled one trended against a counted one.
Slab premium
▲Strong slab premiumThe dearest priced rung is PSA 10 at $764.99, 7.6× the $101.10 raw reference (cheapest delivered ask).
A PSA 10 is worth $764.99 — 7.6× the $101.10 raw cheapest delivered ask.
Dearest slab per grading company
PSA 10$764.997.6×PSA 10 — $764.99, 7.6× raw$838.14 · EBAY · 2026-10-11 · $775.00 · EBAY · 2026-10-10 · $1,027.71 · EBAY · 2026-10-09 +14 more print(s)CGC 9.5$130.69guideThe provider’s MODELLED value for this grade — not a sale and not even an offer. Often extrapolated from the grades that did sell.1.3×CGC 9.5 — $130.69, 1.3× rawACE 2$25.160.2×ACE 2 — $25.16, 0.2× raw$25.16 · EBAY · 2026-09-02Raw$101.10askA live listing. Nobody has paid this.1.0×Raw — $101.10, 1.0× rawThe cheapest copy actually listed for sale, delivered — item plus required shipping. An offer, not a price anybody has paid. Every multiple on this ladder is taken against it.
PSA 10 is the dearest slab on the board at $764.99; the next priced grader is CGC 9.5 at $130.69.
One rung down, a PSA 9 is $114.65 — 1.1× raw.
Grading ROI
▲GradePSA: +$107.76 expected, still +$98.61 at the 95% lower bound of the gem share — break-even needs 16% gems; observed 35% (95% floor 33%, n=3238).
Best on PSA: +$107.76 expected, still +$98.61 at the 95% lower bound of the gem share — break-even needs 16% gems; observed 35% (95% floor 33%, n=3238).
Odds of a 10 vs what it takes
PSA needs 16% tens to break even; the census shows 35%, with a 95% interval of 33% to 36% on 3238 slabs.
break-even 15.5%Break-even15.5%The 10 rate this submission would need just to cover the raw price and the fee. It is the white line on the meter above: the solid segment has to clear it before grading is worth doing at all.observed 34.6% [33.0%–36.2%] n=3238Observed 10 rate34.6%Measured over 3238 graded copies in the census, with a 95% interval of 33.0%–36.2% around it — the band on the meter IS that interval, and it is the width of the doubt, not of the opportunity. A small n makes it wide.
VendorVendorThe grading company, one row each. Rows are the graders we hold both a fee schedule and a population census for — a grader we cannot price is left out rather than estimated.
FeeFeeThe all-in submission cost per card at this grader: grading tier plus shipping both ways and insurance, as published. A † marks a fee we could not read from a published schedule and had to carry from a prior reading. Lower is better.
P(10)P(10)The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
10 price10 priceWhat a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
ROI(10)ROI(10)Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
Pre-grade this card →Photograph your own copy front and back for centering, wear and the odds of each grade. An estimate, not a grade.
$101.10 raw (cheapest delivered ask) + $59.99 PSA Standard + $25.00 ship/ins = $186.09 · less 13.25% sale fee · 45d lockup
Share of what was submitted and kept — not the odds your copy grades 10.
Secret Rare
~1 in 360
Secret Rare — 5 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Secret Rare is 1 in 360 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Ultra Rare~1 in 108Ultra Rare — 12 cards at this rarity, so one NAMED Ultra Rare is 1 in 108 packs, estimated from sets of the same era.
Hit tiers in Shining Legends, hardest at the top. Log scale.
Method▾
P(this card, per pack) = the published odds of its RARITY appearing, split evenly across the cards printed at that rarity in the set; the figure shown is 1/p, the mean number of packs to one copy. The ladder plots every tier of the set on a logarithmic scale, because a set spans two orders of magnitude between its commonest hit and its hardest and a linear scale would pin all but one of them to the same end.
The Pokémon Company has never published physical booster odds in any region, and nobody has published a pack-opening study of this set. This figure is the rate this rarity measured at across sets of the same era — good to about a tier, not to a decimal. It is not a measurement of this set.
Print scarcity
•Moderately printedAgainst every card we can read, this one's implied print run lands in the moderately printed third. It is an ORDER, not a count — the model recovers no print figure and does not try to. Read from Shining Legends's pooled print scale and this card's own pull rate.
Against every card we can read, this one's implied print run lands in the moderately printed third. It is an ORDER, not a count — the model recovers no print figure and does not try to. Read from Shining Legends's pooled print scale and this card's own pull rate.
LightModerateHeavy
Model inputs
Graded copies3,771 copiesGraded copies3,771 copiesSlabs on record across PSA, CGC and ACE, summed over every grade. The model’s raw input — it is NOT the print run, because a card people grade often will show a large population off a small press run. Ungraded and sealed copies are invisible to it.Packs per copy1 in 360Packs per copy1 in 360How many packs it takes to see one named copy of this card — the same figure SCARCITY leads with. It is what converts a set-wide print scale into this card’s own.Set read from16 cardsSet read from16 cardsEvery card in the set with a price, a population and a pull rate gives an independent estimate of how many packs of the set exist. They are pooled by median, so one mis-joined card cannot move the answer.
Method▾
Graded population is print run × how often anyone bothers grading it, and the second factor moves with VALUE — so population is divided by price^0.606, the elasticity fitted across 3,826 cards that carry a population, a price and a pull rate at once. That normalised count is turned into a SET pack scale using the card’s pull rate (every card in a set is an independent read on how many packs exist, pooled by median), then brought back down to this card by its own pull rate. The band is a tertile of the result across every card that clears the gates.
Nobody has ever published a Pokémon print run, and this does not recover one — it is an ORDER, not a count. It reads surviving graded supply across PSA, CGC and ACE, so ungraded and sealed stock are invisible to it. What it is checked against: the model puts Black & White at the bottom of the catalog and modern Scarlet & Violet at the top, which is where the smallest and largest print runs actually are.
AttacksP Full Burst · 30×Cost: PsychicThis attack does 30 damage times the amount of Energy attached to this Pokémon.PC Super Absorption · 60Cost: Psychic · ColorlessHeal 30 damage from this Pokémon.PPP Psystrike GX · 200Cost: Psychic · Psychic · PsychicThis attack’s damage isn’t affected by any effects on your opponent’s Active Pokémon. (You can’t use more than 1 GX attack in a game.)
WeaknessPsychic ×2
Retreat2
LegalStandard ✗not legal · Expanded ✓legal
EvidenceEvidenceThe specific observations the explanation rests on. If this row is thin, treat the explanation as thin — it is the only thing holding it up.
Evidence: item-basis daily bars, TCGplayer active listings, absorption read ("Over 30d: inventory -46.7%, cheap depth no data, sales velocity no data -> ABSORPTION.").
ConfidenceConfidenceHow much weight to put on the primary explanation, given how much of the evidence actually resolved. It qualifies the row above; it never adds to it.
Confidence: 30% (floor-confidence 47/100), based on 979 days of observations.
What would disprove itWhat would disprove itThe observation that would break the primary explanation. It is what makes the reading falsifiable rather than unfalsifiable — and it is the thing to watch for next.
This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.
CatalogCard identity: set, number, rarity, finish, release date. It dates from the printing itself, so an old reading here is expected and is not staleness.
Oct 6, 2017
9.0y
98%
No
Live askA copy offered for sale right now. An ask is what a seller wants, not what anyone paid — it bounds the price from above until it clears.
Oct 13, 2026
2h
90%
No
Guide priceA calculated market guide — a model of where the product is trading. Never a confirmed sale, and always marked Modelled.
Oct 13, 2026
21h
90%
Yes
Price statisticAn observed figure computed over several rows rather than one print — a delivered floor, a published median over a window.
Oct 13, 2026
2h
90%
No
Confirmed saleA completed transaction at a known price — the strongest evidence on this page. Prices are delivered (item + required shipping).
Oct 9, 2026
5d
85%
No
Inventory countHow many copies and listings stand on the book. What depth, supply and absorption are measured against.
Oct 13, 2026
2h
70%
No
Population censusA grader's published count of the copies it has slabbed at each grade. A record of what was submitted and kept, never the odds a copy grades.
Oct 12, 2026
1d
60%
No
Raw · Holo · Near MintWhat every row above was gathered for — one printing, in this one finish and condition or grade. Change either switcher in the header and you are reading a different one; the page's own URL is the address of exactly this one.pq-quant-2026.10.0The version of the scoring and analytics formulas that produced everything on this page. Two figures computed under different versions are not comparable, which is why the version is stated rather than assumed.
+1.9%
4d ago
$102.98 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-09T08:28:46.100ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
$100.98-0.1%5d ago$100.98 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-08T14:30:19.240ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
$75.00-25.8%9d ago$75.00 delivered, 1 unit, 2026-10-04T07:00:00.000ZMeasured against today's cheapest delivered ask — a print above it is information, not bad news.
Relative strength7%64This card’s 30-day return as a percentile of every tracked card that has one. 50 is "moved with the market". Declines to speak until the ranked universe is large enough to mean it.
Value vs fair17%45The cheapest delivered ask against the blended fair-value estimate, two points per percent. Above 50 the card is trading under what the evidence says it is worth. Withheld entirely when fair value declares itself UNKNOWN — a discount measured against an untrustworthy anchor is not a discount.
Scarcity7%58How few of this card exist, as a percentile of every card we can read. Prefers PRINT SCARCITY’s estimate — graded population with the value confound divided out, turned into a print scale by the pull rate — and falls back to packs-per-copy alone where that cannot be read. Scarce is oriented as GOOD, on the theory that thinner supply supports a price. Weighted low on purpose: scarcity is fixed at print and the market has had years to price it in, so this is a structural prior rather than an edge.
Liquidity9%55Four equally-weighted readings of what counterparties did: the chance it trades today, how many of the last 30 days carried a trade, 30-day units sold against the units on the board, and how many different people are selling it. A reading nobody can measure is absent and the rest reweight.
Grading upside6%51Best expected return across grading vendors, half a point per percent — the optionality on top of the raw thesis, never the thesis itself.
Seller concentration5%no readingThe venue attributes no seller identity to these asks.
Reprint risk5%no readingPrint status is unestablished — no shelf observation and no recorded reprint event.
The bottom line is a weighted mean of the signals that reported, renormalised so their weights sum to 1. Nothing defaults to a neutral 50: an input with no evidence is reweighted away and its absence is charged as a confidence penalty. Risk rows (manipulation, concentration, reprint) enter inverted. Data quality carries no weight at all — it decides whether the verdict may be spoken, because knowing a lot about a card is not a reason to buy it. Competitive meta sits OUTSIDE the weighted mean as a capped bonus added after it: a card nobody plays is never marked down for that, and a card the meta is built on can be marked up for it.
The Legends Booster Pack's most recent plotted day carries the provider’s daily guide value — no sale was recorded that day.
Indexed to each product’s own first stored day = 100. Legends Booster Pack in front, 10 behind · dashed = guide price, no sale that day.Each line is that product’s own price divided by its own first stored day and multiplied by 100, so every series starts on the dotted rule and the axis measures APPRECIATION rather than price. Dollars could not do this job here: a booster pack and a booster box differ by two orders of magnitude, and on a shared dollar axis the pack would sit flat on the floor of the plot however far it had actually travelled. The Legends Booster Pack is the base unit and is drawn in front; the rest are drawn behind it, and each one’s own numbers are in the table below. A dashed stretch is a run of days with no recorded sale, carrying the provider’s daily guide value — a quoted price, never a trade.
Appreciation vs MSRP
ProductPriceMSRPvs MSRPEvery sealed product the catalog holds for this set, ordered by how standard a unit each is for tracking a set’s sealed price. PRICE is the product’s last stored day — a sale where one was recorded, the provider’s daily guide value where none was, and the row’s hover says which. MSRP is blank wherever no source is recorded against one, because an MSRP with nobody behind it is not a fact. VS MSRP is the price against that MSRP, as a percentage up to a doubling and as a multiple past it.
Legends Booster Pack$111.31——Shining Legends Booster Pack—Shining Legends Booster Pack. Quoted at $111.31 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Pin Collection: Marshadow$334.99——Shining Legends Pin Collection: Marshadow—Shining Legends Pin Collection: Marshadow. Quoted at $334.99 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Pin Collection: Pikachu$342.99——Shining Legends Pin Collection: Pikachu—Shining Legends Pin Collection: Pikachu. Quoted at $342.99 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Pin Collection: Zoroark$386.50——Shining Legends Pin Collection: Zoroark—Shining Legends Pin Collection: Zoroark. Quoted at $386.50 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Pin Collection: Mewtwo$414.63——Shining Legends Pin Collection: Mewtwo—Shining Legends Pin Collection: Mewtwo. Quoted at $414.63 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Collection: Shiny Darkrai GX$462.49——Shining Legends Collection: Shiny Darkrai GX—Shining Legends Collection: Shiny Darkrai GX. Quoted at $462.49 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Elite Trainer Box$1,179.79——Shining Legends Elite Trainer Box—Shining Legends Elite Trainer Box. Quoted at $1,179.79 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.Legends Super-Premium Collection [Ho-Oh GX]$1,560.00——Shining Legends Super-Premium Collection [Ho-Oh GX]—Shining Legends Super-Premium Collection [Ho-Oh GX]. Quoted at $1,560.00 on Oct 13, 2026 — a guide price, with no sale recorded that day. No MSRP is recorded against this product, so there is nothing to measure a premium from; the blank is a missing MSRP, not a missing price.
Risk-wtdRisk-wtdThe same return weighted by the odds of each grade, not just the 10 — the number to compare graders on, because a high P(10) at a high fee can lose to a lower one. A leading ≈ means the full grade distribution was unavailable and a coarser method stood in. Higher is better.
ACE
$24.39ACE Basic — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. £18.00 converted at GBP/USD 1.355 (2026-09-01) — a conversion, not a quoted USD price. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Core $16.26, Value $20.33.
26.7%95% interval 17.1%–39.0% on n=60. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for ACE, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no ACE price at grade 10 at any basis.
BGS
$79.95BGS Express — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-09-01. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Base $14.95.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for BGS, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no BGS population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator.
CGC
$20.00CGC Economy — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Bulk $17.00.
9.6%95% interval 7.2%–12.6% on n=469. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
—No 10 price is on file for CGC, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no CGC price at grade 10 at any basis.
PSA
$59.99PSA Standard — the cheapest tier accepting single-card submissions, read 2026-10-06. Cheaper tiers you cannot use today: Value Bulk $24.99, Value $32.99.
34.6%95% interval 33.0%–36.2% on n=3238. A share of what was submitted and kept, not submission odds.
$764.99What a 10 from this grader actually sells for. The superscript says what kind of evidence that is — a sale, an unsold listing, or the provider’s own modelled guide.
+257%+$477.54 on a $186.09 cost basis.
+53%Risk-weighted across all 11 PSA rungs; 99% of the distribution carried its own price, the remaining 1% valued at the pooled sub-10 price.
SGC
$79.00†No published SGC fee verified — this is the generic fallback, not SGC's price.
—The share of this card’s submissions to this grader that came back a 10, from its own population census. It is what WAS submitted and kept, not the odds your particular copy grades — a card people only submit when it looks perfect reads high here for that reason alone.
—No 10 price is on file for SGC, so no return can be computed for it — an absence, never a zero.
—Return if the card grades a 10 and sells at that price: (10 price − raw price − fee) over what you put in. The BEST case, before any probability is applied. Higher is better.
—Risk-weighted ROI withheld: no SGC population total, so P(10) has no honest denominator. Fee is the generic $79.00 fallback — SGC's own published price is not in the fee table.