INDICATIVE — published for reference while its coverage is still building — not a benchmark. Level largely guide-priced.
aspara (value weighted) has published no level yet, with no published predecessor to compare it against. Computed over 5 constituents, 100% of target weight priced and index confidence 0.58.
Level—LevelA ratio against this index's 1000 base on Jul 1, 2026, reported in index points.1D—7D—30D—Since Jul 1, 2026—Since Jul 1, 2026This series began Jul 1, 2026, after this calendar year's Jan 1 — its change since inception, never labelled YTD.Cards5CardsHow many instruments the index is computed over on its newest published day.Wt cover100%Wt coverThe share of TARGET WEIGHT that had a usable price on this day — distinct from the share of CARDS, since a heavy constituent going unpriced costs more coverage than a light one.Observed80%ObservedThe share of CONSTITUENTS freshly observed on this day. The rest carry their last observed price forward, never an interpolated one, so lower means a staler level rather than a wrong one.Confidence0.58ConfidenceWeight coverage with each constituent's weight scaled by the confidence of its own price. 1.00 would be a fully priced basket every one of whose prices rests on same-day transacted evidence.StatusPROVISIONALStatusWhere this level stands in its own revision lifecycle. PROVISIONAL until every constituent price behind it is final; REVISED when a restatement has moved it.As ofOct 12, 2026As ofThe newest UTC day this index published a level for. Levels publish once per day.
One point per UTC day — the grain the series is actually published at, so nothing is aggregated or inventedOne point per ISO week (Mon–Sun), taking the LAST value published in it — a roll-up, never a re-computationOne point per calendar month, taking the LAST value published in it — a roll-up, never a re-computation
How each period is drawn. This series publishes ONE value per period — there is no open, high or low — so candles and bars are unavailable and the mark is a line or an area. The DATA does not change with the mark.
Price scale (linear, log or percent), auto-scaling, and the note on exactly how these bars were built.
Expand the chart to the whole viewport. Same bars and same drawings — only the room they get changes.
Cursor — chart crosshair, pan and zoomTrend line — two pointsHorizontal line — one click, priced at the axisRay — two points, extended forwardZone — two cornersFibonacci retracement — anchor the move, start to endNote — click, then typeMeasure — drag for change, percent and barsMagnet — snap each new anchor to the nearest bar's open, high, low or close, so a line lands on an observation rather than between two of them.Nothing to clear — there are no drawings on this card.DRW
aspara (value weighted) constituents, weights, price provenance and contributions
#
Card
Set
TargetTargetThe weight this constituent’s definition ASSIGNED it, before renormalization over the priced part of the basket and before the per-asset cap. Empty on the frozen legacy pair, which recorded one weight and no target.
EffectiveEffectiveThe weight actually APPLIED on this day. It exceeds the target when neighbours went unpriced and this constituent’s share grew to cover them, and falls short of it when the per-asset cap bit. The column sums to 100%.
PricePriceThe constituent’s evaluated price as of the index’s own as-of day, not as of right now.
Method
Methodology & coverage
Every eligible raw NM English card aspara is credited on — the same eligibility as artist:aspara:ew — weighted by each card's share of the body of work's total evaluated value at the reconstitution, capped at 50% per card. Read against artist:aspara:ew: equal weight says what the TYPICAL card did, this says what the body of work's MONEY did. An index is a computed level, not a tradeable instrument: it has no order book, no listings and no sales tape. Each constituent keeps its own.
Construction
UniverseARTIST · vwUniverseThe family of universe rule this series is built from. Its full selection rule lives in the definition version below, and the cards it selected are the constituents table above.WeightingAVWWeightingHow each constituent's target weight is derived before caps and renormalization.Target sizeAll eligible
Rebalance history
Recorded reconstitution runs, newest first: effective date, additions, deletions, turnover and cap relaxation
Effective
Added
Dropped
Turnover
Cap
Oct 1, 2026
0
11 dropped on 2026-10-01Sliggoo
0.2%
0Cap relaxationThe definition’s per-asset caps were satisfiable exactly as written on this run.
Sep 1, 2026
11 added on 2026-09-01Sliggoo
bps
Ranked over all 5 constituents by basis points of the index's one-day move.
MethodWhat kind of evidence that price is made of, weakest last. A basket that moved on carry-forwards is a different reading from one that moved on same-day sales, and no aggregate coverage number can tell them apart.
ConfConfHow much the price policy trusts that price, 0 to 1. It is what scales this constituent’s weight in the index’s confidence-weighted coverage.
1D1DThe constituent’s own one-day return. A card with no fresh observation carries its last observed price forward — never an interpolated one — so a flat reading can mean “no new print”.
ContribContribHow many basis points of the index’s one-day move came from THIS card: its own return scaled by the share of the basket it carries. Big weight plus a small move can outrank a small weight with a big one, and the column sums to the index’s own move. 100 bps is one percent.
35.6%PennyApplied at 35.6% against a 31.9% target — the difference is the per-asset cap and the renormalization over whatever else went unpriced.
$13.38
BOOKBOOK_ANCHOREDNo same-day print: the active ask ladder anchored against a prior evaluation.
0.60
▼-2.7%
-97bpsPenny-97 bpsBasis points of the index’s one-day move that came from this card alone — its -2.69% move scaled by the 35.6% of the basket it carries.
25.2%TympoleApplied at 25.2% against a 24.9% target — the difference is the per-asset cap and the renormalization over whatever else went unpriced.
$9.80
BLEND1BLEND_SALE_BOOK_PRIORExactly one same-day print, blended with the best ask, a prior evaluation and comparables.
0.63
▲+2.2%
+53bpsTympole+53 bpsBasis points of the index’s one-day move that came from this card alone — its +2.19% move scaled by the 25.2% of the basket it carries.
22.5%ArvenApplied at 22.5% against a 20.7% target — the difference is the per-asset cap and the renormalization over whatever else went unpriced.
$8.46
BOOKBOOK_ANCHOREDNo same-day print: the active ask ladder anchored against a prior evaluation.
0.60
▼-2.0%
-45bpsArven-45 bpsBasis points of the index’s one-day move that came from this card alone — its -1.97% move scaled by the 22.5% of the basket it carries.
16.7%NemonaApplied at 16.7% against a 16.4% target — the difference is the per-asset cap and the renormalization over whatever else went unpriced.
$5.93
BLEND1BLEND_SALE_BOOK_PRIORExactly one same-day print, blended with the best ask, a prior evaluation and comparables.
0.66
▼-0.3%
-6bpsNemona-6 bpsBasis points of the index’s one-day move that came from this card alone — its -0.34% move scaled by the 16.7% of the basket it carries.
0.0%WeavileExcluded from this day's level because it had no evaluated price at all on this day. Its target weight was redistributed over the constituents that did price.
—
—
0.00
—
0bpsWeavile0 bpsBasis points of the index’s one-day move that came from this card alone — its own price change scaled by the 0.0% of the basket it carries.
All 5 constituents · AVW-weighted over all eligible constituents, capped at 50.0% per asset; base 1000 on 2026-07-01; method idxmv:1.0.0, prices evp-1.1.0.
Target sizeHow many constituents the definition selects. 'All eligible' means the universe rule alone decides the size — there is no ranked cut.
Cap per asset50.0%Cap per assetThe most weight any one constituent may carry. Above it, the excess is redistributed over the rest — which is what makes the effective weights in the table above diverge from their targets.
Missing dataRENORMALIZEMissing dataWhat the definition does when a constituent has no usable price on a day. RENORMALIZE redistributes its weight over the constituents that did price — never a held zero return, which would report a day of no movement the index did not have.
Base1,000 on Jul 1, 2026BaseWhere the level started. Every reading is a ratio against it, reported in index points.
Cadence5 recorded, ~31d apartCadenceMeasured from this series' own recorded reconstitution runs, not from a published schedule — no field on this payload promises one, so none is claimed.
Methodologyidxmv:1.0.0MethodologyThe methodology version in force on the newest published day. Methodology versions are immutable; a change is a new version, never an edit.
Definitionartist:aspara:vw@2DefinitionThe definition version this index was built under — the row that holds its universe rule, weighting, caps and eligibility gates.
Price policyevp-1.1.0Price policyThe evaluated-price policy version behind every constituent price above. It is what decides which evidence is admissible and what confidence each method may carry.
Coverage on Oct 12, 2026
StateINSUFFICIENTStatetoo little of the target weight was priced for the level to stand on its own — read it as a placeholder for the day, not a measurement of itWeight priced100%Weight pricedThe share of TARGET WEIGHT that had a usable price. Distinct from the share of cards: a heavy constituent going unpriced costs more coverage than a light one.Confidence-weighted58%Confidence-weightedThe same coverage with each constituent's weight scaled by the confidence of its own price. The gap between this and the line above is how much of the priced weight rests on weak evidence.Index confidence0.58Index confidenceThe series-level confidence rolled up from its constituents, 0 to 1.Cards priced4 of 5Cards pricedHow many constituents had a usable price on this day, out of the basket.Stale weight0%Stale weightThe share of target weight sitting on a price older than this series' stale tolerance. A stale price is a real number from a real day, carried forward — never interpolated — so this is how much of the level is looking backwards.Stale cards0Stale cardsHow many constituents were carrying a stale price on this day.Quality tierINDICATIVEQuality tierWhat the level rests on, rolled up from its constituents' evaluated-price quality tiers: largely guide-priced.
0
0.0%
0Cap relaxationThe definition’s per-asset caps were satisfiable exactly as written on this run.
Aug 1, 2026
0
0
0.0%
0Cap relaxationThe definition’s per-asset caps were satisfiable exactly as written on this run.
Jul 1, 2026
55 added on 2026-07-01Weavile · Reverse HoloArvenNemonaPennyTympole
0
—
0Cap relaxationThe definition’s per-asset caps were satisfiable exactly as written on this run.
Jul 1, 2026SUPERSEDED
55 added on 2026-07-01Weavile · Reverse HoloArvenNemonaPennyTympole
0
—
0Cap relaxationThe definition’s per-asset caps were satisfiable exactly as written on this run.
The last 5 recorded reconstitutions. Turnover is the share of the basket that changed hands at the run; cap is how far down the predeclared relaxation ladder the weight solver had to go, and 0 means the declared caps held.
Penny239/091
Tympole103/086
Arven235/091
Nemona238/091
Weavile · Reverse Holo045/217