Alakazam E4 LV.X — 103/111

Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).

What changed

Sold median moved +0.0% over the trailing 7 days and +0.0% over 30 days, last printing at $0.00. Active TCGplayer listings fell 0% over the same 7 days to 0.

Primary explanation

Primary read: no single factor dominates; the composite score is being driven by broad, low-amplitude movement across most inputs.

Alternative

Alternative explanation: with only 0 distinct sellers/observations in the trailing window, the move could just as easily be sampling noise rather than a durable shift.

Evidence

Evidence: raw~tcgdex:pl2-103:EN:HOLO~NM|SOLD_MEDIAN|TCGPLAYER, raw~tcgdex:pl2-103:EN:HOLO~NM|LISTING_COUNT|TCGPLAYER, absorption read ("Insufficient data: 0 inventory observation(s) in the trailing 30d window (need >= 4).").

Confidence

Confidence: 0%, based on 0 days of observations.

What would disprove it

This read would be wrong if active listings rebound above 0 while sold median keeps falling.

No recommendation available.